Isaiah 5:

13 Therefore my people are gone into captivity, because they have no knowledge: and their honourable men are famished, and their multitude dried up with thirst.

 

Hosea 4:

6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.

 

John 8:

32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

 

Ecclesiastes 7:

25 I applied mine heart to know, and to search, and to seek out wisdom, and the reason of things, and to know the wickedness of folly, even of foolishness and madness:

 

1 Corinthians 1:

21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.

 

1 Corinthians 3:

19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.

 

 

 

Source:

https://youtu.be/Kf0R2hbQ8g4

Microsoft patent aanvraag 2020-060606

koppelt menselijk lichaam aan betalingssysteem

 

1. WO2020060606 - CRYPTOCURRENTIE SYSTEEM MET GEBRUIK VAN DE LICHAAMS ACTIVITEITS GEGEVENS

1. WO2020060606 - CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA

 

Publication Number WO/2020/060606

Publication Date 26.03.2020

International Application No.PCT/US2019/038084

International Filing Date 20.06.2019

IPC

       

 

CPC

 

Applicants

  • MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC [US/US]; One Microsoft Way Redmond, Washington 98052-6399, US

 

Inventors

  • ABRAMSON, Dustin; US
  • FU, Derrick; US
  • JOHNSON, Joseph Edwin, JR.; US

 

Agents

  • MINHAS, Sandip S.; US
  • CHEN, Wei-Chen Nicholas; US
  • HINOJOSA, Brianna L.; US
  • HOLMES, Danielle J.; US
  • SWAIN, Cassandra T.; US
  • WONG, Thomas S.; US
  • CHOI, Daniel; US
  • HWANG, William C.; US
  • WIGHT, Stephen A.; US
  • CHATTERJEE, Aaron C.; US
  • JARDINE, John S.; US
  • GOLDSMITH, Micah P.; US
  • TRAN, Kimberly; US
  • PEREZ, Edgar; US

 

Priority Data

16/138,51821.09.2018 US

 

Publication Language English (EN)

Filing Language English (EN)

Designated States

AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW
African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) (BW, GH, GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW)
Eurasian Patent Organization (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, TM)
European Patent Office (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, TR)
African Intellectual Property Organization (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, KM, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG)

 

 
 
(EN) CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA
(FR) SYSTÈME DE CRYPTOMONNAIE UTILISANT DES DONNÉES D'ACTIVITÉ CORPORELLE
(NL) CRYPTOMONIA SYSTEEM MET GEBRUIK VAN LICHAAMSACTIVITEITSGEGEVENS
 
 

Abstract (EN)

Human body activity associated with a task provided to a user may be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system. A server may provide a task to a device of a user which is communicatively coupled to the server. A sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device of the user may sense body activity of the user. Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. The cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify if the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system, and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.
(FR)
L'activité du corps humain associée à une tâche fournie à un utilisateur peut être utilisée dans un processus de minage d'un système de cryptomonnaie. Un serveur peut fournir une tâche à un dispositif d'un utilisateur qui est couplé de manière à communiquer avec le serveur. Un capteur couplé de manière à communiquer avec un dispositif de l'utilisateur ou compris dans ce dernier peut détecter l'activité corporelle de l'utilisateur. Des données d'activité corporelle peuvent être générées sur la base de l'activité corporelle détectée de l'utilisateur. Le système de cryptomonnaie de la présente invention couplé de manière à communiquer avec le dispositif de l'utilisateur peut vérifier si les données d'activité corporelle satisfont une ou plusieurs conditions définies par le système de cryptomonnaie, et attribuer une cryptomonnaie à l'utilisateur dont les données d'activité corporelle sont vérifiées.

 

Also published as US16138518

Samenvatting
(NL)
Activiteit van het menselijk lichaam in verband met een taak die aan een gebruiker wordt verstrekt, kan worden gebruikt in een mijnproces van een cryptocurrency-systeem. Een server kan een taak van een apparaat van een gebruiker uitvoeren die communicatief is gekoppeld aan de server. Een sensor die communicatief gekoppeld is aan of opgenomen is in het apparaat van de gebruiker, kan lichaamsactiviteit van de gebruiker waarnemen. Gegevens over lichaamsactiviteit kunnen worden gegenereerd op basis van de waargenomen lichaamsactiviteit van de gebruiker. Het cryptocurrency-systeem dat communicatief is gekoppeld aan het apparaat van de gebruiker, kan verifiëren of de lichaamsactiviteitsgegevens voldoen aan een of meer voorwaarden die zijn vastgesteld door het cryptocurrency-systeem, en cryptocurrency toekennen aan de gebruiker wiens lichaamsactiviteitsgegevens zijn geverifieerd.

 

Latest bibliographic data on file with the International Bureau

 

 

Source:

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606

 

NATURE BRIEFING  17 MARCH 2020

 

Daily briefing: First coronavirus vaccine clinical trials begin in United States

The phase I trial of the vaccine from drug company Moderna is just the beginning of a long process to test safety and efficacy. Plus: a ‘completely accidental’ discovery hints at how to use standard silicon microchips in a quantum computer and a year without conferences raises the question of whether we need them at all.

 

Chance discovery hints at quantum leap

Researchers have discovered “by complete accident” a way to control the nucleus of a single atom using only electric fields. Theorists predicted in 1958 that an oscillating electric field could flip a nucleus, but it had never been observed. The finding hints that it might be possible to use standard silicon microchips as the quantum bits, or qubits, in a quantum computer without messing around with difficult-to-constrain magnetic fields.

 

First US vaccine clinical trial begins

• The first phase I clinical trial for a potential COVID-19 vaccine has begun in Seattle, Washington. Over the next 6 weeks, 45 participants will receive varying first doses of the vaccine, followed by a second dose 28 days later. They will then be assessed over a 14-month period. The experimental vaccine relies on messenger RNA, which directs the body to make a protein found on the new coronavirus's outer shell — hopefully eliciting an immune response that protects against infection. (Nature | Continuously updated)

Read more: Safety must come first in the rush to develop vaccines and treatments for the coronavirus, argues virologist Shibo Jian. (Nature | 5 min read)

• The decision to close schools to slow the spread of COVID-19 weighs heavily on the shoulders of governments who must consider the risk to teaching staff, the impact on students and how childcare needs might hinder essential workers or expose older family members to infection. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that evidence from other countries shows that places where schools were closed, such as Hong Kong, “have not had more success in reducing spread than those that did not”, such as Singapore. (The Washington Post | 8 min read)

• The COVID-19 virus isn’t ‘airborne’ in the sense that it lingers infectiously in the air for some time, like measles. But the extent to which the coronavirus can be spread through the air, in the form of droplets from a sneeze or cough, is not yet known — and there is some disagreement among scientists about the very definition of airborne. (Wired | 10 min read)

 

Source: 

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00802-1

COVID-19 a Doctor’s perspective PART 1/2

PROOF IT'S A SCAM

Source:

https://youtu.be/gwk8SQNojVA

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0Q4naYOYDw

Lockdowns were absolutely unnecessary, and came at exactly after the Wuhan virus had already peaked in NYC. Only the elderly should have been quarantined in nursing homes. The Wuhan virus is no different from a normal influenza virus in terms of epidemiology. The people in charge of CDC do not understand even basics of epidemiology.

Watch all previous episodes of Perspectives on the Pandemic here:

Episode 1: https://youtu.be/d6MZy-2fcBw

Episode 2: https://youtu.be/lGC5sGdz4kg

Episode 3: https://youtu.be/VK0Wtjh3HVA

Episode 4: https://youtu.be/cwPqmLoZA4s

Episode 5: https://youtu.be/k0Q4naYOYDw

 

If you don’t believe these doctors how about top European professors.

Follow the links below. https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/24/12-experts-questioning-the-coronavirus-panic/ https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/17/8-more-experts-questioning-the-coronavirus-panic/

Insane Murd r Going on in NYC Hospitals RN Discloses ~ Go Viral

 

Source:

https://youtu.be/BR05LEDo5nM

 

Mike Adams presents his vision of the globalists' game plan

to eliminate 90% of the population with a two-step vaccines.

 

Source:

https://www.brighteon.com/68c3afc6-b2ec-4b51-8d3c-96aa968b5c98

 

 

The Truth about vaccines 2020 series makes the details of the plan obvious.

 

Source: 

https://go2.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/docuseries/episode-7/?utm_campaign=ttav&utm_medium=email&utm_source=ttav-2020-optins&utm_content=ep7-ttav-2020-apr28-1130pm&a_aid=5903de82cac79

 

 

Plague 》Pharmakeia 》Mark of the Beast

Source: 

https://youtu.be/cblW-X-dkPg

 

Nahum 3:4

Revelation 9: 21; 21:8; 18:23; 13

2Peter 2:1

Isaiah 74:4-7

 

 

Gedwongen vaccinatie: “Wist u al…?

12.12.2019

Source:

https://www.kla.tv/15334

 

Vaxxed, de schokkende waarheid!?

 

Source:

https://www.kla.tv/Vaccinatie/15175

 

Everyone in the world needs to know about this HUGE WIN for we the people!!!

Since the US mass media is so rotten – we the people need to search for the real news.

I found more info on the lawsuit mentioned in the email below at: 

 

U.S. GOVT LOSES LANDMARK VACCINE LAWSUIT

Case 1:18-cv-03215-JMF Document 18 Filed 07/09/18

https://cairnsnews.org/2018/11/19/u-s-govt-loses-landmark-vaccine-lawsuit/?fbclid=IwAR2G5Ao3MoGdnEcV9R3OOGTL77IwFic9DzYrJ_Ce5t7Ek0JpjQcF4ueP8l0

 

Janet Lee

Thanks to: Mike HUFFMAN 
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 6:24 PM
Subject: Fwd: vaccines must read GOOD READ

  MUST READ  SEND TO ALL
Date: April 24, 2020 at 5:03 PM


Subject: vaccines


Begin forwarded message:

Date: April 24, 2020 at 10:08:46 AM PDT
To

Government funding was pulled from Gates Foundation, WHO and CDC (Centre for Disease Control). U.S. Government lost a LANDMARK VACCINE LAWSUIT!
Vaccine injury lawyer Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Del Bigtree, producer of the suppressed vaccine documentary, 'VAXXED' and the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) are credited with this victory.

They demanded the relevant government documents proving that all federally approved vaccines had been tested for quality over the past 32 years — and there were NONE! Zero, zilch, nada!

Here are the huge legal and practical implications in this victory for the American people:   This means that the US Department of Health and Human Services and all vaccine makers have been deceiving the American people for over 30 years about the effectiveness and safety of vaccines; this may ultimately mean that the continuing existence — at least in their current form — of five US "healthcare" agencies is now in doubt: the CDC, the FDA, the IOM, the NIH and the "Health" part of DHHS itself!

 

Janet Lee’s Note:  I hope we can save the multiBillions these unconstitutional departments have been costing:  CDC  $6.7 Billion a year; FDA $5.7Billion a year; IOM $858Million; NIH $39Billion a year; HHS $90Billion a year.  One of the main complaints of our forefathers was that King George had created so many ‘offices’ for which the people were being taxed  the US gummit is far worse!!!  In addition the US gummit gave over $10Million to the Gates Foundation!  The US Budget has been a piggy bank for the worst kinds of parasites!!!  How is the AMA funded:

Funded by the drug industry, a single, medical monopoly was established using the insurance industry, the U.S. Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Internal Revenue Service (IRC), the U.S. Postal Service and other state and federal agencies.Oct 11, 2017

This may also threaten the existence of state medical boards and exclusive medical guilds like the AMA. This means that vaccine makers have been fraudulently exempt from what all other pharmaceutical drug makers have been forced to do concerning biannual recertification for quality and effectiveness — meaning that their vaccines have never been tested for quality and have had no proven safety or effectiveness for over 30 years.

This case can now be legally cited by all parents fraudulently mandated by any government/ organizational regulation/ requirements that they must vaccinate their children for school or any other activity to stop the forced vaccination of their children. This case can now be legally cited by all employees being mandated by their employers to be vaccinated in order to retain their jobs. This case can now be legally cited by all those who seek compensation for vaccine injury.

The future of allopathic medicine in its current form is now in doubt, and the global pharmaceutical cartel, since almost all of the drugs allopathic practitioners prescribe come from pharmaceutical corporations that have also committed vaccine fraud and injury.

LIABILITY: All government officials who have passed laws legalizing vaccine fraud at the state, national, or international level, or otherwise aided and abetted this vaccine fraud can now be charged with vaccine fraud, criminal malfeasance and in some cases, war crimes under the Nuremberg Code.

 

Forced vaccinations now can be legally stopped-no quality control for 32 years

Wide ramifications for Australia

Go to:

https://www.aimintegrativemedicine.com/aim-integrative-medicine-blog/why-kennedy-sued-the-government-over-vaccine-safety-won

http://icandecide.org/governments/

 

 

U.S. GOVT LOSES LANDMARK VACCINE LAWSUIT

 

NOV 19

Posted by 

 

Case 1:18-cv-03215-JMF Document 18 Filed 07/09/18

Vaccine injury lawyer Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,&  Del Bigtree, producer of the suppressed anti-vaccine documentary, Vaxxed and the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) are credited with this victory. They demanded the relevant government documents proving that all federally approved vaccines had been tested for quality over the past 32 years — and there were none.

Here are the huge legal and practical implications in this legal victory for the American people:

 

A recent US court case revealed there has been no quality control over vaccines manufactured by big-pharma for at least 32 years. Autism rates are excepted to drop dramatically now that parents can stop the poison being injected into their kids

 

o This means that the US Department of Health and Human Services and all vaccine makers have been lying to the American people for over 30 years about the effectiveness and safety of vaccines; this may
ultimately mean that continuing the existence — at least in their current form — of five US “healthcare” agencies are now in doubt: the CDC, the FDA, the IOM, the NIH and the “Health” part of DHHS itself;
this may also threaten the existence of state medical boards and exclusive medical guilds like the AMA:

o This means that vaccine makers have been fraudulently exempt from what all other pharmaceutical drug makers have been forced to do concerning biannual recertification for quality and effectiveness — meaning that that their vaccines have never been tested for quality and have had no proven safety or effectiveness for over 30 years;

o This case can now be legally cited by all parents fraudulently mandated by any government/organizational regulation/requirements that they must vaccinate their children for school or any other activity to stop
the forced vaccination of their children;

o This case can now be legally cited by all employees being mandated by their employers to be vaccinated in order to retain their jobs;

o This case can now be legally cited by all those who seek compensation for vaccine injury, making it likely that the pharmacidical vaccine industry can in the near future be legally bankrupted out of existence, like Bayer-Monsanto after the landmark legal victory won by the dying landscaper in San Francisco several weeks ago, as well as their stock value plummeting precipitously;

o The future of allopathic medicine in its current form is now in doubt, as well as that of the global pharmacidical cartel, since almost all of the drugs allopathic practitioners prescribe come from pharmacidical corporations which have also committed vaccine fraud and injury;

o The existence of the deep-state corporate mainstream news media will now also be further endangered, since 70% of their income stream comes from the global pharmacidical cartel, which in America has been
responsible for 750,000-1 million human sacrifices per year for at least the past half century;

o Autism rates will now likely plummet, freeing the American people from another deep state-engineered debility, and providing further evidence of mass vaccination-caused autism;

o All government officials who have passed laws legalizing vaccine fraud at the state, national, or international level, or otherwise aided and abetted this vaccine fraud can now be charged with vaccine fraud, criminal malfeasance and in some cases, war crimes under the Nuremberg Code.

-contributed

This letter from Dawn Bell, an American health professional, warns that vaccines are not safe and become ineffective after 10 years. She says her daughter was injured by vaccination:

In the recent mumps outbreak, 100% of the mumps cases were college students, who were ALL 100% vaccinated. 90% (9 out of 10) people who died from last years flu epidemic had received the flu shot.

Herd immunity can only be achieved when 85% of the population is immune to a disease. Vaccines are only good for about 10 years, at absolute max 20 years, so most people over the age of 20 are not immune any longer. So now you have created a situation of a “false” immunity.

Those who get the chicken pox are immune for life, those who get the vax are not. I do believe, maybe to your surprise that vaccines can and have saved lives, however, think about when MD’s we’re giving out antibiotics like popcorn at the movies, it started having a bad affect on our immune systems and gut. It’s propbable to think that the same thing might start happen with the overuse of vaccines.

For really deadly diseases, hey I’m all for it, but they started making so much money that you all of a sudden had to start getting vaccines for everything, even the everyday childhood diseases and for stuff like Hep B at 1 day old, really? The rise in autism and other sensory diseases has been mind boggling, as well as childhood autoimmune disorders.

32 people get sick from ecoli and FDA tells everyone to stop buying romaine lettuce, but thousands report issues with vaccines and it’s pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. Then everyone is surprised when people get upset and start asking questions.

I’m an Occupational Therapist and was all in with the vax thing, until I watched my daughter lose Speech ability directly following a vaccine. I was one telling everyone it was a coincidence until I saw it happen with my own eyes to my own kid. They have NEVER done safety studies in these vaccines have NEVER been studied being given all at once as they do.

It’s common sence that all of these vaccines given to a child with a developing immune system and neuro system might have some issues. It’s the lying about it that really has everyone worried though. When they say safety studies have been done when no one can find them, then Kennedy offers $$ for anyone who show they have been done. Of course no one could produce them so hence this lawsuit and of course, they haven’t. My OBGYN told me the flu shot was studied and proven safe during pregnancy.

So I go to work, as a nurse friend for the flu vax insert and guess what? It clearly stated it had not been studied in children or pregnant woman and if given to pregnant woman you should call and add them to a registry. Furthermore, on the front of the box, it stated to NOT give to kids under 5! I could keep going, but I’ll end with, have you watched the CDC video aproving the Hep vax?

If not, you should because it’s extremely interesting! First, they give to 1 day old babies and it’s never been approved for those under 18. When asked if it was safe to give with other vaccines they said they didn’t know but we’re making the assumption it was generally safe like other vaccines. Then when asked about the “new” mutated gene thing they said the same thing, “we’re making the assumption that’s it’s safe like other vaccines.”

They were then asked about the heart and autoimmune markers seen in their internal study and they acknowledged that they saw the markers and were going to monitor it and make determination Dec 2020 whether not there was a problem, and in the mean time it’s being given to day old babies. So yes, there are concerns that need to be addressed about the safety of vaccines and I’m thrilled that it’s finally being addressed!!!

 

Source:

https://cairnsnews.org/2018/11/19/u-s-govt-loses-landmark-vaccine-lawsuit/?fbclid=IwAR2G5Ao3MoGdnEcV9R3OOGTL77IwFic9DzYrJ_Ce5t7Ek0JpjQcF4ueP8l0

 

https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2019R1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/168629

 

For additional information or interviews please contact:
Catharine Layton, COO, ICAN
cat@icandecide.org (512) 522-8739

https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2019R1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/168629

 

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/24201840/Informed_Consent_Action_Network_v_United_States_Department_of_Health_and_Human_Services

 

BMR vaccinatie: Geeft Autisme

14 maanden en bij 9 jaar.

 

Mijn dochter kreeg autisme na de 9 jaar vaccinatie.

 

De BMR Bof, mazelen, rodehond -vaccinatie beschermt tegen de bof, mazelen en rodehond. De eerste vaccinatie werkt bij 95% van de kinderen. Kinderen krijgen twee keer de BMR-vaccinatie, met 14 maanden en als ze 9 jaar zijn. Na 2 vaccinaties is meer dan 99% van de kinderen beschermd.

 

Source:

https://rijksvaccinatieprogramma.nl/vaccinaties/bmr

 

https://jdreport.com/waarom-worden-zwangere-vrouwen-opeens-bestookt-met-een-niet-werkend-vaccin/

 

42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22.Standards of responsibility

 

(a)General rule

Except as provided in subsections (b), (c), and (e) State law shall apply to a civil action brought for damages for a vaccine-related injury or death.

(b)Unavoidable adverse side effects; warnings
(1)
No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.
(2)
For purposes of paragraph (1), a vaccine shall be presumed to be accompanied by proper directions and warnings if the vaccine manufacturer shows that it complied in all material respects with all requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.] and section 262 of this title (including regulations issued under such provisions) applicable to the vaccine and related to vaccine-related injury or death for which the civil action was brought unless the plaintiff shows—
(A)
that the manufacturer engaged in the conduct set forth in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 300aa–23(d)(2) of this title, or
(B)
by clear and convincing evidence that the manufacturer failed to exercise due care notwithstanding its compliance with such Act and section (and regulations issued under such provisions).
(c)
Direct warnings

No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, solely due to the manufacturer’s failure to provide direct warnings to the injured party (or the injured party’s legal representative) of the potential dangers resulting from the administration of the vaccine manufactured by the manufacturer.

(d)
Construction

The standards of responsibility prescribed by this section are not to be construed as authorizing a person who brought a civil action for damages against a vaccine manufacturer for a vaccine-related injury or death in which damages were denied or which was dismissed with prejudice to bring a new civil action against such manufacturer for such injury or death.

(e)
Preemption

No State may establish or enforce a law which prohibits an individual from bringing a civil action against a vaccine manufacturer for damages for a vaccine-related injury or death if such civil action is not barred by this part.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXI, § 2122, as added Pub. L. 99–660, title III, § 311(a), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3773; amended Pub. L. 100–203, title IV, § 4302(b)(1), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–221.)

 

 

Source: 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/300aa-22

The LIE about CORONA

Your Liberty is at stake

WW3

NWO

 

 

SSnumber

Revelation 13:

17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

VACCINES ARE IN SCRIPTURES:


Revelation 18:
23 - And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants (Bill Gates, Big Pharma) were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries (medicines/vaccinations, poison, drugs) were all nations deceived.

Strong's G5331 - pharmakeia

†φαρμακεία pharmakeía, far-mak-i'-ah; from G5332; medication ("pharmacy"), i.e. (by extension) magic (literally or figuratively):—sorcery, witchcraft.

The use or the administering of drugs, poisoning, sorcery, magical arts,
often found in connection with idolatry and fostered by it

metaph. the deceptions and seductions of idolatry

Do NOT use your SSnumber you cannot by or sell without it anymore. (Revelation 13:17)
It is the PERSON = SIN in James 2:9 Get out of the Babylon system. (Revelation 18)

https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G5331&t=KJV

 

James 5:

14 Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the YHWH (Lord):

15 And the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he have committed sins, they shall be forgiven him.

16 Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much.

 

2 Chronicles 16:

12 And (King) Asa in the thirty and ninth year of his reign was diseased in his feet, until his disease was exceeding great: yet in his disease he sought NOT TO YHWH  (the LORD), but to the physicians.

13 And Asa slept with his fathers, and died in the one and fortieth year of his reign.

14 And they buried him in his own sepulchres, which he had made for himself in the city of David, and laid him in the bed which was filled with sweet odours and divers kinds of spices prepared by the apothecaries' art: and they made a very great burning for him.

 

Exodus 15:

26 And said, If thou wilt diligently hearken to the voice of the LORD thy God, and wilt do that which is right in his sight, and wilt give ear to his commandments, and keep all his statutes, I will put none of these diseases upon thee, which I have brought upon the Egyptians: for I am the LORD that healeth thee.

 

Galatians 5:

20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,

 

Revelation 9:

21 Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their sorceries, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts.

 

Revelation 18:

23 And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries (Vaccinations/drugs) were all nations deceived.

 

1 Corinthians 3:

16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?

17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.

18 Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise.

19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.

20 And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain.

 

 

James 2:
9 But if ye have respect to PERSONS, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
11 For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law.
12 So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.

 

Why His name is not Lord but YHWH used in James 5:14

 

James 5:

14 Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the YHWH (Lord):

 

Matthew 4:

10 Then saith Jesus G2424 unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: G4567 for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord G2962 (κύριος) thy God, G2316 and him only shalt thou serve.

 

Luke 4:

8 And Jesus G2424 answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: G4567 for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord G2962 (κύριος) thy God, G2316 (θεός) and him only shalt thou serve.

 

Deuteronomy 26:

10 And now, behold, I have brought the first fruits of the land, which thou, O LORD, hast given me. And thou shalt set it before the LORD thy God and worship before the LORD H3068 (יְהֹוָה / YHWH) thy God: H430 (אֱלֹהִים / elohiym)

 

So as you can see G2962  and H3068 are the same name. used in these two scriptures Luke 4:8  and in Deut 26:10.

 

 

the LORD H3068 (יְהֹוָה / YHWH)

the Lord G2962 (κύριος)

 

thy God: H430 (אֱלֹהִים / elohiym)

thy God, G2316 (θεός) 

 

Deuteronomy 6:

13 Thou shalt fear the LORD H3068 (יְהֹוָה) thy God H430 (אֱלֹהִיםand serve him, and shalt swear by his name.

 

Deuteronomy 10:

20 Thou shalt fear the LORD (יְהֹוָה) thy God (אֱלֹהִים) ; him shalt thou serve, and to him shalt thou cleave, and swear by his name.

 

Matthew 5:

33 Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord (יְהֹוָה) G2962 thine oaths:

 

Matthew 4:

4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of GodG2316 (יְהֹוָה)

 

Deuteronomy 8:

3 And he humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know; that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the LORD H3068 (יְהֹוָה) doth man live.

 

So as you can see G2316  and H3068 are the same name. used in these two scriptures Matt 4:4  and in Deut 8: 3.

 

 

Exodus 3:

18 And they shall hearken to thy voice: and thou shalt come, thou and the elders of Israel, unto the king of Egypt, and ye shall say unto him, The LORD God of the Hebrews hath met with us: and now let us go, we beseech thee, three days' journey into the wilderness, that we may sacrifice to the LORD our God.

 

Exodus 5:

3 And they said, The God of the Hebrews hath met with us: let us go, we pray thee, three days' journey into the desert, and sacrifice unto the LORD our God; lest he fall upon us with pestilence, or with the sword.

 

Exodus 7:

16 And thou shalt say unto him, The LORD (יְהֹוָה) God (אֱלֹהִים) of the Hebrews H5680 (עִבְרִי / Ibriy / Evri) hath sent me unto thee, saying, Let my people go, that they may serve me in the wilderness: and, behold, hitherto thou wouldest not hear.

 

Exodus 9:

1 Then the LORD said unto Moses, Go in unto Pharaoh, and tell him, Thus saith the LORD God of the Hebrews, Let my people go, that they may serve me.

13 And the LORD said unto Moses, Rise up early in the morning, and stand before Pharaoh, and say unto him, Thus saith the LORD God of the Hebrews, Let my people go, that they may serve me.

 

Exodus 10:

3 And Moses and Aaron came in unto Pharaoh, and said unto him, Thus saith the LORD God of the Hebrews, How long wilt thou refuse to humble thyself before me? let my people go, that they may serve me.
Here is the remaining match.

 

 

Source:

https://banned.video/watch?id=5e80fc82797aad00b0798b4e

 

Coronavirus Act 2020

 

Coronavirus Act 2020 Long titleAn Act to make provision in connection with coronavirus; and for connected purposes.Citation2020 c. 7Introduced byMatt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (Commons)
James Bethell, 5th Baron Bethell (Lords)Territorial extentEngland and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland (varies by section)DatesRoyal assent25 March 2020Commencement25 March 2020[a]Other legislationRelates toCivil Contingencies Act 2004
Status: Current legislation
Text of the Coronavirus Act 2020 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk.

The Coronavirus Act 2020 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that grants the government emergency powers to handle the 2020 coronavirus pandemic. The Act allows the government the discretionary power to limit or suspend public gatherings, to detain individuals suspected to be infected by COVID-19, and to intervene or relax regulations in a range of sectors to limit transmission of the disease, ease the burden on public health services, and assist healthcare workers and the economically affected. Areas covered by the Act include the National Health Service, social care, schools, police, Border Force, local councils, funerals and courts. The Act was introduced to Parliament on 19 March 2020, and passed the House of Commons without a vote on 23 March, and the House of Lords on 25 March. The Act subsequently received royal assent on 25 March 2020.

Politicians from parties including the Conservatives, Labour, and the Liberal Democrats demanded closer parliamentary scrutiny of the legislation while it was debated in Parliament. Advocacy groups such as Liberty and Disability Rights UK have likewise called for closer examination of the Act and raised concerns over its effects on human rights during and after the pandemic.

Provisions

The provisions of the Coronavirus Act, which are time-limited for two years, enable the government to restrict or prohibit public gatherings, control or suspend public transport, order businesses such as shops and restaurants to close, temporarily detain people suspected of COVID-19 infection, suspend the operation of ports and airports, enrol medical students and retired healthcare workers in the health services, relax regulations to ease the burden on healthcare services, and assume control of death management in particular local areas.[1][2][3][4][5] The government has stated that these powers may be "switched on and off" according to the medical advice it receives.[6]

The Act also provides for measures to combat the economic effects of the pandemic. It includes the power to halt the eviction of tenants, protect emergency volunteers from becoming unemployed, and provide special insurance cover for healthcare staff taking on additional responsibilities.[6] The government will reimburse the cost of statutory sick pay for employees affected by COVID-19 to employers, and supermarkets will be required to report supply chain disruptions to the government.[7]

The Act formally postpones the local elections originally scheduled for May 2020 and grants the UK and relevant devolved governments the power to postpone any other election, local referendum, or recall petition until 6 May 2021. Local councillors, elected mayors and Police and Crime Commissioners originally due for election in 2020 will serve three-year terms after their election in 2021, rather than the normal four years, in order to maintain the normal election cycle.[8]

Time limit and renewal

The Act has a two-year time limit that may be shortened or lengthened by six months at ministerial discretion.[9] Following a government amendment, the Act is additionally subject to parliamentary renewal every six months.[10] It would originally have been returned to Parliament for debate one year after its enactment.[9]

Debate and criticism

BBC News reported on 19 March that there was general agreement in Parliament on the measures contained in the Act, but some MPs had raised criticisms of their extended duration.[6] Conservative backbencher, Steve Baker reluctantly supported the bill but said that it was ushering in a "dystopian society" and urged the government not to allow the measures to continue "one moment longer" than necessary.[11] Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn wrote to Prime Minister Boris Johnson on 18 March requesting that MPs be granted a vote to renew the bill every six months,[12] while Labour MP Chris Bryant argued that the bill should be subject to renewal every 30 days.[13] The acting leader of the Liberal Democrats, Ed Davey, also requested that the bill be subject to more frequent parliamentary scrutiny.[12]

Commentator Ian Dunt labelled the Act the "most extensive encroachment on British civil liberties ... ever seen outside of wartime".[14] The human rights pressure group Liberty called for closer scrutiny of the bill, raising concerns that significant restrictions on civil liberties could remain in place beyond the end of the pandemic,[15] and Disability Rights UK also raised serious concerns about the implications of the Coronavirus Bill on human rights, especially the rights of vulnerable groups, including disabled people.[16]

Legislative history

The Act was introduced by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Matt Hancock, on 19 March 2020,[17] and passed all remaining stages of consideration in the House of Commons on 23 March without a vote.[18] It received all stages of consideration in the House of Lords on 25 March,[19] and subsequently received royal assent on 25 March 2020.

Conservative MP and former Brexit Secretary David Davis tabled an amendment on 21 March to restrict the time limit of the bill to a "brick-wall stop" of one year, threatening a backbench rebellion.[20] Conceding to concerns from both Conservative and Labour MPs over infrequent parliamentary scrutiny, on 23 March the government itself amended the bill to require parliamentary renewal of its powers every six months.[10]

 

Source:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus_Act_2020

https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/coronavirus-act

https://www.xandernieuws.net/algemeen/britse-corona-wet-geeft-overheid-macht-om-iedereen-zonder-proces-onbeperkt-op-te-sluiten-te-behandelen-en-weg-te-werken/

 

a Medical Review by Dr Eric Zielinski:

"Don’t believe the media, the 2020 coronavirus (COVID-19) does not appear to be nearly as deadly as it’s portrayed to be – and it’s nowhere near the fatality of SARS or MERS. Yes, elderly, immune-compromised people are dying. In fact, “a China study shows that for coronavirus patients aged 70 to 79 the death rate more than triples. For those older than 80 it’s more than six times as high.” (NPR)

 

But, it’s nothing for the vast majority of people to go hysterical about." The New England Journal of Medicine says, "On the basis of a case definition requiring a diagnosis of pneumonia, the currently reported case fatality rate is approximately 2%. In another article in the Journal, Guan et al. report mortality of 1.4% among 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19; these patients had a wide spectrum of disease severity. If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively." Dr Z continues, "According to a top Chinese health official, Liang Wannian, the fatality rate is China has been between 3-4%. Though, this is only for extreme concentrations of people infected. Outside of Wuhan — the city at the epicenter of the outbreak, the death rate in China has been about 0.7% – closer to the flu virus. (NPR) NRP reports that “a study released by China’s Center for Disease Control last month, found that if you factor out all the data from Hubei province, where Wuhan is located, the fatality rate in the rest of China drops to 0.4%. (NPR)

 

It’s important to note that the death rate has steadily dropped as the disease spreads, and the earliest, most severe cases made COVID-19 look like a much fatal that it really is. We should expect this pattern of progressively dropping death rates in other countries as well. I just read a headline from CNBC, “Up to 150 Million Americans are Expected to Contract the Coronavirus, Congressional Doctor Says.”

 

What a load of malarkey.

 

As COVID-19 travels the world, the imminent threat of doom looms over every nation. It’s important to keep a close eye on China as the Asian country of 1.4 billion residents has become the ideal case study for us all to learn from.

 

Good News (assuming that China health officials are reporting honestly)…

 

Of the roughly 81,000 people infected in China since December 2019, nearly 62,000 or 76% have FULLY recovered already and that number is climbing fast. (Tasmin News, WorldOMeters)

Plus, there are only 31 new reported cases in China in the last 24 hours. COVID-19 has officially lost steam in China, which is great news – the life cycle of this virus is quick! (WorldOMeters, WHO)

The last two of 16 temporary hospitals in Wuhan, China have officially been shut down. “The final group of 49 patients walked out of the Wuchang temporary hospital in the capital of Hubei province on Tuesday afternoon to cheers, according to the Xinhua news agency. (New York Post, Xinhua News Agency)

It cannot be stressed enough that only 56 per 1 million Chinese residents have been infected. Even in the most heavily affected countries, we’re only seeing 206 per 1 million Italians, and 153 per 1 million South Koreans infected.

 

Yes, it is such a tragedy for those who have lost their lives, and our hearts go out to their families… but the total death toll of ~4,700 people is NOTHING compared to the 25,000–54,000 that die from the flu every MONTH. You are even twice as likely to be killed as a pedestrian than you do losing your life to this virus! (Dept of Transportation, Lancet)

 

Now, we must keep a close watch on other countries to see if this 3-4 month COVID-19 life cycle remains a constant. If so, then this entire situation will be only be a memory in the U.S. coming early summer with relatively few people being affected and losing their lives.

 

Bottom Line: COVID-19 acts quick, in and out – kills a high number of elderly and immune-compromised people, leaves kids alone and pretty much goes away after a couple months.

 

Again, China has 1.4 billion residents and only ~ 81,000 have been infected since December, and yesterday (March 10) only 31 new cases were reported. (WHO)

I like that math…   When we look at the death toll, the numbers become quite clear at who truly is at risk and who’s relatively “safe.”

 

From the Washington Post:

 

'In China, only 2.4 percent of reported cases were children and only 0.2 percent of reported cases were children who got critically ill, according to the World Health Organization. China has reported no case of a young child dying of the disease COVID-19….For ages 10 to 39, however, the fatality rate is roughly 0.2 percent, according to a separate study drawing on patient records of 44,672 confirmed cases. And fatalities and severe symptoms are almost nonexistent at even younger ages.'

 

Thus, the new coronavirus is behaving differently from other viruses, like the seasonal flu, which are usually dangerous for both the very young and very old.

 

Bottom line, kids and 99% of most healthy adults should not be overly concerned about the coronavirus.

 

“Meanwhile, the new coronavirus has proved especially deadly on the other end of the age spectrum. The fatality rate in China for those over 80 is an estimated 21.9 percent, per the WHO.

 

These data points help put things into perspective, don’t they? Not trusting the media at this point should be a given. They are virtually 100% responsible for the pandemonium that is happening right now.

 

Fear. That’s what the media is spoon-feeding the world as coronavirus pandemonium has officially fever-pitch. To help find proper perspective…

 

First off, yes, we are validating that COVID-19 is a serious threat, but it is NOT a time to panic. The current situation is being presented by the media as being unprecedented and has been greatly over exaggerated, thus causing mass chaos across the globe.

 

To compare with the H1N1 virus outbreak from April 12, 2009 to April 10, 2010, in the U.S. (CDC)

 

60.8 million cases

274,304 hospitalizations

12,469 deaths

No global chaos, no national shut downs, no mass fear.

Globally, the H1N1 outbreak:

 

151,700-575,400 deaths during the first year the virus circulated.

80% of (H1N1) virus-related deaths were estimated to have occurred in people younger than 65 years of age.

NOTE: This differs greatly from typical seasonal influenza epidemics, during which about 70- 90% of deaths are estimated to occur in people 65 years and older.

Again, no global chaos, no national shut downs, no mass fear.

Now… not to get political here or into conspiracy theories, but every EVERY election year seems to feature a disease outbreak/virus scare. Coincidence?

 

SARS – 2004

AVIAN – 2008

SWINE – 2010

MERS – 2012

EBOLA – 2014

ZIKA – 2016

EBOLA – 2018

CORONA – 2020

Makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

 

The main concern we should have is this irrational fear media has placed in people across the globe. This is BIG news for them and they are making TONS of money as their ratings skyrocket – advertisers are loving this.

 

You’ll want to be prepared with the things that we’ll need if they quarantine a street, neighborhood, your church, school or city. Citizens across all countries are hoarding toilet paper and bottled water and the government is intervening. Schools and public events are closing at alarming rates.

 

The world is in chaos over this and it is 100% based on irrational (media-driven) fear, and the media is having a hay day with us here. A well-known online influencer was recently speaking at an event where another speaker discovered he had COVID-19. So, to do what was “socially responsible,” the healthy, presumably uninfected influencer put herself in self-quarantine because she had contact with this infected person, and announced it to the world as a badge of honor. When I watched her video, I was not only shocked, but saddened. Here’s why…

 

When you consider that 80% of those who are infected with the COVID-19 will have cases involving mild symptoms (according to World Health Organization (WHO) spokesman Tarik Jasarevic), is preventative quarantining really necessary?

 

Fear has taken people to the extreme here, and isolating people and blocking off communities, cities and entire countries because groups of people may have the potential of being “carriers” of the virus doesn’t make sense from a public health perspective, nor is it humane. Same with preventing social gatherings larger than 250 – 500 people or whatever the arbitrary number is that local and state governments are coming up with. All this may possibly do is slow down the spread of an outbreak, it will not stop it, which I’ll get into below in more detail.

 

Now don’t get me wrong. “Social distancing” (staying away from people if you’re sick) is just plain common sense. If you have a cold, flu, coronavirus, pneumonia or any contagious health condition, like always, stay home. Why put others at risk of being infected? And why put yourself at risk of getting sicker!

 

Preventatively quarantining individuals and communities for 2+ weeks, however, is a completely different story.

 

Fact is, quarantining people away from society does NOT guarantee that the virus will stop spreading. It only (slightly) slows it from spreading.

 

“As the CDC and other public health agencies know, quarantine by itself may delay the spread of an infectious disease, but it cannot prevent or end any disease outbreak. It has not succeeded in the past and is ill-suited to the realities of the contemporary world.”

 

~ Wendy K. Mariner, J.D., Professor of Health Law

 

In fact, history tells us that attempts at preventative quarantining people in the past generally fail miserably. (New York Times) For starters, it’s extremely costly and unsustainable – particularly for the working middle and lower classes. How are day workers supposed to support themselves if they’re cooped up for 2 weeks? Not to mention, isolating someone for 2 weeks is inhumane (14 days is the longest incubation period seen for similar coronaviruses so this is where health authorities came up with this time frame).

 

Preventative quarantining has already proven to be ineffective as the virus continues to spread, and it will continue to spread until it reaches its course – no matter how hard we try by shutting down schools and closing businesses.

 

The repercussions of quarantining people has more serious ramifications…

 

“Fear of being quarantined itself can create resistance. If you’re afraid you’re going to get locked up somewhere, you may not want to admit you have an illness. You may not want to go to the doctor for fear of being reported. If you are told you can’t leave your city, you might flee. That’s what happened in China during the SARS outbreak. A rumor that the government was planning a large-scale involuntary quarantine caused nearly 250,000 people to leave Beijing. And quarantines aren’t without their costs. The Wuhan quarantine has had numerous unintended effects, some of them fatal. People were unable to reach sick, elderly parents in the city, let alone take them elsewhere for treatment of chronic conditions like heart disease and cancer. The United Nations AIDS agency recently announced that one-third of people in China who are living with HIV were at risk of running out of their HIV medications because of lockdowns and travel restrictions. The quarantine has also severely slowed China’s economy.”

 

~ Wendy K. Mariner, J.D., Professor of Health Law

 

Similar to preventative quarantining, wearing construction and general surgical masks is not effective at all. In fact, as the recent headline clearly states, “Surgeon General Urges the Public to Stop Buying Face Masks.” (New York Times)

 

“Seriously people — STOP BUYING MASKS!” the surgeon general, Jerome M. Adams, tweeted. “They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus, but if health care providers can’t get them to care for sick patients, it puts them and our communities at risk!”

 

Adams’ plea comes as a response to panicked consumers who are rushing to buy masks online, which has led to price gouging and counterfeit products.

 

Thinner surgical masks that many people are wearing were designed for surgeons, because they can help keep airborne pathogens being omitted from the surgical from the entering doctor’s nose and mouth. However, they are not effective at keeping out viral particles because they do not fit tightly enough around the nose and cheeks as a more specialized mask – known as an N95 respirator – this can help with COVID-19. The N95 respirator is thicker than a surgical mask, but it is not recommended for public use at this point." The above article was a Medical Review by Dr Eric Zielinski

 

https://naturallivingfamily.com/coronavirus-myths/

 

CORONAVIRUS

Justice Department Reportedly Asks Congress for Indefinite Detention Powers To Fight Coronavirus

Congress should loudly and unanimously reject this insanity.

 | 3.21.2020 4:03 PM

 

The Justice Department is using the COVID-19 outbreak to press for sweeping new powers that include being able to detain Americans indefinitely without a trialPolitico reports.

The department is asking Congress to allow the U.S. attorney general to ask courts to suspend court proceedings. These include "any statutes or rules of procedure otherwise affecting pre-arrest, post-arrest, pre-trial, trial, and post-trial procedures in criminal and juvenile proceedings and all civil process and proceedings," reports Betsy Woodruff Swan, citing DOJ documents presented to Congress.

In other words, the Justice Department would be able to postpone trials, hearings, and other procedural steps that follow arrest. That represents a potentially huge violation of the constitutional right to a speedy trial.

Those powers would apply "whenever the district court is fully or partially closed by virtue of any natural disaster, civil disobedience, or other emergency situation," Woodruff Swan writes, and would remain in place for "one year following the end of the national emergency."

 

Perhaps the Justice Department is attempting to find out whether there are any libertarians in a pandemic. The right to see a judge and seek release from detention after an arrest—known in legal lingo as habeas corpusis one of the fundamental building blocks of a democratic society, one in which the state cannot deprive individuals of their freedom without due process. The times in American history when that right has been suspended or circumvented are some of the darkest. We should not be seeking to repeat them.

"The DOJ proposal is deeply troubling and would raise a whole host of constitutional concerns," says Scott Bullock, president and general counsel for the Institute for Justice, a libertarian law firm. "History demonstrates again and again that governments use a crisis to expand power and violate vital constitutional principles. And when the supposed emergency is over, the expanded powers often become permanent."

Clark Neily, vice president for criminal justice at the Cato Institute, says the Justice Department should not be trusted with more expansive powers.

"If history is any indication, it's a near certainty that these powers will be abused and that DOJ will try to hide those abuses when they occur," says Neily. "This is simply not an agency that has earned the kind of trust implied by these requests for increased authority and discretion."

It's also unclear how allowing indefinite detention would help fight the coronavirus outbreak. It seems more likely that the DOJ is learning from members of Congress and the president that the crisis provides a convenient excuse to ask for things it already wanted in the first place.

"Congress must loudly reply 'NO,'" wrote Rep. Justin Amash on Twitter.

 

Source:

https://reason.com/2020/03/21/justice-department-reportedly-asks-congress-for-indefinite-detention-powers-to-fight-coronavirus/

 

Rex 84: FEMA’s Blueprint for Martial Law in America

 

Global Research, March 21, 2020
Salon.com Blogs and Global Research 20 August 2006

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above  

This incisive article on the repeal of civil liberties and freedom of speech in America was first published by Global Research in August 2006,

It brings to forefront of debate the ongoing road map towards Police State in America.

It is of particular significance with regard to the appointment of William Barr to the position of Attorney General, not to mention the publication of an  FBI document which states that “conspiracy theories” can motivate “domestic extremists to  commit criminal and sometimes violent activity”

(M.Ch, GR Editor)

 

***

We are dangerously close to a situation where ~ if the American people took to the streets in righteous indignation or if there were another 9/11 ~ a mechanism for martial law could be quickly implemented and carried out under REX 84.  

The Cheney/Bush administration has a plan which would accommodate the detention of large numbers of American citizens during times of emergency.

The plan is called REX 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984. Through Rex-84 an undisclosed number of concentration camps were set in operation throughout the United States, for internment of dissidents and others potentially harmful to the state.

The Rex 84 Program was originally established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA.

 

US FEMA Concentration Camps

 

Existence of the Rex 84 plan was first revealed during the Iran-Contra Hearings in 1987, and subsequently  reported by the Miami Herald on July 5, 1987

” These camps are to be operated by FEMA should martial law need to be implemented in the United States and all it would take is a presidential signature on a proclamation and the attorney general’s signature on a warrant to which a list of names is attached.”

And there you have it ~ the real purpose of FEMA is to not only protect the government but to be its principal vehicle for martial law.

This is why FEMA could not respond immediately to the Hurricane Katrina disaster ~ humanitarian efforts were no longer part of its job description under the Department of Homeland Security.

It appears Hurricane Katrina also provided FEMA with an excuse to “dry run” its unconstitutional powers in New Orleans, rounding up “refugees” (now called “evacuees”) and “relocating” them in various camps. “Some evacuees are being treated as ‘internees’ by FEMA,” writes former NSA employee Wayne Madsen.

Reports continue to come into WMR that evacuees from New Orleans and Acadiana [the traditional twenty-two parish Cajun homeland] who have been scattered across the United States are being treated as ‘internees’ and not dislocated American citizens from a catastrophe

We are dangerously close to a situation where ~ if the American people took to the streets in righteous indignation or if there were another 9/11 ~ a mechanism for martial law could be quickly implemented and carried out under REX 84.

Be forewarned ~ the Cheney/Bush administration will stop at nothing to preserve their power and their ongoing neocon mis-adventure and they have currently proposed having executive control over all the states National Guard troops  in a national emergency.

Governor Tom Vilsack of Iowa, called the proposal ” one step away from a complete takeover of the National Guard, the end of the Guard as a dual-function force that can respond to both state and national needs.”

The provision was tucked into the House version of the defense bill without notice to the states, something Vilsack said he resented as much as the proposal itself.

Under the provision, the president would have authority to take control of the Guard in case of  ” a serious natural or manmade disaster, accident or catastrophe” in the United States.

Do remember, to the Cheney/Bush administration ~ the Mob at the Gates that they truly fear is not terrorists but, instead, the people demanding the truth.

REX 84 AND FEMA

http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/FEMA-Concentration-Camps3sep04.htm

MINDFULLY, 2004 – There over 800 prison camps in the United States, all fully operational and ready to receive prisoners. They are all staffed and even surrounded by full-time guards, but they are all empty. These camps are to be operated by FEMA should martial law need to be implemented in the United States and all it would take is a presidential signature on a proclamation and the attorney general’s signature on a warrant to which a list of names is attached. . . The Rex 84 Program was established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA.

Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons.

Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program is initiated for its proper purpose. Garden Plot is the program to control the population. Cable Splicer is the program for an orderly takeover of the state and local governments by the federal government.

FEMA is the executive arm of the coming police state and thus will head up all operations. The Presidential Executive Orders already listed on the Federal Register also are part of the legal framework for this operation.

The camps all have railroad facilities as well as roads leading to and from the detention facilities. Many also have an airport nearby. The majority of the camps can house a population of 20,000 prisoners.

Currently, the largest of these facilities is just outside of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Alaskan facility is a massive mental health facility and can hold thousands of  people.

The original source of this article is Salon.com Blogs and Global ResearchCopyright © Allen L Roland, Salon.com Blogs and Global Research, 2020

 

Source: 

https://www.globalresearch.ca/rex-84-fema-s-blueprint-for-martial-law-in-america/3010

 

US FEMA Detainment Camps

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-fema-camps/7763?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles

 

 

Local jails releasing hundreds of prisoners amid coronavirus fears, up from dozens just weeks ago

Kevin Johnson USA TODAYPublished 11:22 AM EDT Mar 26, 2020

It started with a trickle.

Fearing that the coronavirus could wreak havoc once inside densely packed jails, local officials across the country quietly began releasing some of their most vulnerable, including the elderly and chronically ill.

The goal, said National Sheriffs' Association president Sheriff Daron Hall, was to reduce the risk both to prisoners and officers, while freeing up necessary space to quarantine other inmates who may become infected.

Dozens set free during the first wave of releases early this month have now become hundreds, as state and local governments have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks to guard highly susceptible prison populations, and the staff working there, against the spread of the deadly virus.

In Cleveland, officials have moved more than 700 prisoners out of the Cuyahoga County Jail in less than two weeks; near Oakland, California, more than 250 have been set free; in Nashville, Tennessee, up to 300 have been released; and across New Jersey, hundreds of prisoners were expected to exit county jails this week under an order issued by Supreme Court Chief Justice Stuart Rabner.

The ACLU estimated that the New Jersey releases could reach 1,000.

Outlining the unprecedented action, a somber state Attorney General Gurbir Grewal, a former prosecutor, said he took “no pleasure” in the announcement and cautioned the newly liberated that authorities would be watching.

Authorities across the country may be watching, but they also have begun to distance themselves, in many cases, from suspects as they seek to protect themselves from infection.

“This (health emergency) is forcing us to take action that we wouldn’t consider during normal times,” Grewal said. “We have to take bold and drastic steps because when this pandemic is over, I need to be able to look my daughters in their eyes to say that we took every step possible to help all the residents of this state – including those serving jail sentences.”

Indeed, the new policies come with high-stakes risks all their own as authorities seek to balance public health needs and the safety of their communities.

"Everyone feels the weight of these decisions," said Hall, who for nearly 20 years has served as sheriff of Davidson County, Tennessee. "The real crisis right now in criminal justice is in the jails, and we have to address it."

Locking out virus: Prisons restrict movements as they try to keep coronavirus out

 

The extraordinary action comes as a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers and civil rights advocates are calling on the federal Bureau of Prisons, the nation's largest detention system, to follow the local lead. 

In a letter earlier this week to Attorney General William Barr and BOP Director Michael Carvajal, the group of senators led by Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Richard Durbin, D-Ill., urged the government to begin moving the elderly and terminally ill from the 175,000 in custody.

"Conditions of confinement do not afford individuals the opportunity to take proactive steps to protect themselves, and prisons often create the ideal environment for the transmission of contagious disease," the senators wrote. "For these reasons, it is important that consistent with the law and taking into account public safety and health concerns, that the most vulnerable inmates are released or transferred to home confinement, if possible."

Describing the risk of a prison outbreak to "a fire in a dry barn," some conservative groups, including the American Conservative Union, called on the president to intervene. The groups urged the president to issue an executive order, allowing the elderly and non-violent offenders who have served two-thirds of their sentences to complete their terms at home. 

President Donald Trump said Sunday that the administration was considering such a move, but no action has followed.

So far, six federal inmates and four staffers have tested positive for the virus. Federal prison officials, who earlier this month halted all visitation, said Tuesday that they will now quarantine all new prisoners for 14 days in a further effort to limit the virus' spread.

Coronavirus in US: States playing an outsized role in battle, but are far from united

'Dire straits'

In many local communities, however, early-release decisions began emerging weeks ago.

Brendan Sheehan, the presiding judge of Cuyahoga County's Common Pleas Court in Cleveland, said he met with fellow judges March 11 to discuss their options amid the rapidly evolving health crisis and how it could upend operations at the overcrowded jail.

At that time, the jail population stood at 1,978; the facility is designed for a maximum 1,700 prisoners.

In short order, Sheehan said prosecutors, defense lawyers and judges began work on a plan that has resulted in the release of more than 700 prisoners. Some serving state sentences were moved to Ohio prisons, while others serving time or awaiting trial for non-violent offenses were approved for release.

Within 10 days, Sheehan said, the jail population had been reduced by 500 inmates. And more have been moved out since then.

"At first people probably thought we were nuts," the judge said. "But then the NBA cancels its season, and you say, 'wait a minute.' Everyone understood the dire straits that we were in; everyone got on the same page."

Despite the consensus action, Sheehan said the action remains a gamble.

"Our goal is to protect the community, but we're also trying to make our (criminal justice) system safe," the judge said. "Every judge is concerned; every judge tried to do the right thing."

Sweeping policy in South Carolina

 

The Anderson County Detention Center in Anderson, S.C. in Anderson Thursday, March 18, 2020.
Ken Ruinard / staff

 

Chad McBride wasn’t totally opposed to releasing dozens of prisoners from the Anderson County, South Carolina, jail as a precaution against a potential outbreak of the feared coronavirus.

As the local sheriff who oversees all detention operations, McBride knew that there were aging, ill and low-level prisoners who probably could be cut loose with little or no risk while reducing persistent overcrowding.

McBride’s beef is that he wasn’t personally consulted before more than 40 offenders were released, largely on their own promises to appear for future court hearings.

“Half of these guys are going to be back in jail in weeks,” the sheriff said, describing the releases as a "knee-jerk reaction."

Weighing release: Trump considers fate of some federal prisoners after inmate tests positive for coronavirus

The actions, however, appeared to meet a sweeping standard set by Supreme Court Chief Justice Donald Beatty, who in a March 16 memo to local magistrates and municipal judges called for the pretrial release of "any person charged with a non-capital crime" on personal recognizance bonds unless suspects represented an unreasonable danger or an extreme risk of flight.

"I do get that this is an emergency," McBride said. "I'm not saying that the solicitor (local prosecutor) and the public defenders are making unwise decisions. But I was never consulted. I think we could have provided some useful information. A lot of these people (prisoners) are nuisances, and we're going to have to deal with these guys again. We're still going to have to go after them."

The sheriff said he had specific concerns about a 20-year-old repeat offender, Stephen W. Kneece, who was approved for bond based on his promise to appear at future hearing, though he was wanted on an attempted murder charge and other felony offenses in neighboring Greenville County.

The local prosecutor's office said the bond was approved knowing that Greenville authorities had placed a "hold" on the suspect, preventing Kneece from release.

"It is typical for an offender to get (personal recognizance) bonds on low level charges in one county so he can be transferred to another jurisdiction, where he faces more serious charges, which are the priority cases," the prosecutor's office said.

Greenville County authorities confirmed that Kneece was picked up and transported to the jail there where he is being held without bond.

"We do not typically consult the sheriff, himself, when setting bonds, and did not do so in this case," the prosecutor's office stated, adding that some jail staffers did assist in identifying prisoners with medical problems that might qualify for release.

"All of this was done and continues to be done in an effort to reduce the jail population and proactively address the potential damage COVID-19 could do to a group of inmates in our county," the prosecutor's office said.

'Uncharted waters'

In New Jersey, Gov. Phil Murphy called the county jail releases a "prudent measure."

Under terms of the court order, sentences for probation violations or municipal court convictions were either being suspended or converted to time-served, resulting in release.

Prosecutors and the attorney general's office could halt some releases by registering individual objections, the attorney general said. 

"I don't know that there is another state that has done this," Murphy said this week at a coronavirus-related briefing. "We're doing something because we're in uncharted waters."

Contributing: Frank Fernandez, Daytona Beach, Florida, News-Journal; Kirk Brown, Anderson, South Carolina, Independent Mail; Brad Zinn, Staunton, Virginia, News-Leader

Published 11:22 AM EDT Mar 26, 2020

 

Source: 

https://eu.coloradoan.com/story/news/politics/2020/03/26/jails-free-hundreds-prisoners-stop-coronavirus/5077204002/

 

Coronavirus Latest: Maryland State Police Prepared To Arrest Anyone Who Defies Business Shutdown, Up To $5K Fine Or 1 Year In Jail

 

MARYLAND (WJZ) — Businesses and individuals who don’t comply with Gov. Hogan’s order to shut down dine-in service could be fined up to $5,000 or spend a year in jail.

The governor announced an executive order Monday restricting public gatherings and business operations due to COVID-19, and state police and local law enforcement agencies say they will be involved, when needed, to enforce the governor’s executive order in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

His order mandated that all businesses shut down dining-in and restrict themselves to carry-out or delivery options only in an effort to minimize gatherings of 250 or more people.

Food trucks, barber shops, salons and funeral facilities can all remain open but there cannot be gatherings of more than 50 people, the executive order said.

 

 

 

State police said they will be responding to complaints for businesses who do not comply, working with local authorities.

CORONAVIRUS COVERAGE: 

“Depending on the call and location, we will first make contact with the owner or manager of the establishment. If voluntary compliance does not occur, we will take enforcement action, in cooperation with the local state’s attorney.” said Maryland State Police Superintendent Cl. Woodrow W. Jones III.

The superintendent said that if the violation at an establishment involves customers or those who have gathered and they don’t leave when asked, they could be arrested.

“If the violation at an establishment or gathering involves customers or simply individuals who have gathered and voluntary compliance has not occurred, appropriate action will be taken that could ultimately result in the arrest of the individuals involved.” Jones said in the statement.

Any violation of the executive order is punishable for a fine of up to $5,000 or one-year in jail- or both, Jones said.

For the latest information on coronavirus go to the Maryland Health Department’s website or call 211. You can find all of WJZ’s coverage on coronavirus in Maryland here.

 

Source:  

https://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2020/03/17/maryland-state-police-prepared-to-arrest-anyone-who-defies-business-shutdown-5k-fine-or-1-year-in-jail/

 


Posted byu/Dr_Midnight
10 days ago
COVID-19
‘We’re not playing around’: Maryland law enforcement prepared to arrest people who defy coronavirus shutdown

 

I cannot get this article on my internet.....something is VERY fishy.

Source:

https://www.tribpub.com/gdpr/baltimoresun.com/

https://www.reddit.com/r/maryland/comments/fk95qu/were_not_playing_around_maryland_law_enforcement/

 

Do you know the story of JOB. This is what is ahead for us. YOU WILL LOSE EVERYTHING.

Especially when you are non compliant.

 

 

 

12 Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic

Global Research, March 25, 2020
OffGuardian 24 March 2020

Below is our list of twelve medical experts whose opinions on the Coronavirus outbreak contradict the official narratives of the MSM, and the memes so prevalent on social media.

***

Dr Sucharit Bhakdi is a specialist in microbiology. He was a professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz and head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene and one of the most cited research scientists in German history.

What he says:

We are afraid that 1 million infections with the new virus will lead to 30 deaths per day over the next 100 days. But we do not realise that 20, 30, 40 or 100 patients positive for normal coronaviruses are already dying every day.

[The government’s anti-COVID19 measures] are grotesque, absurd and very dangerous […] The life expectancy of millions is being shortened. The horrifying impact on the world economy threatens the existence of countless people. The consequences on medical care are profound. Already services to patients in need are reduced, operations cancelled, practices empty, hospital personnel dwindling. All this will impact profoundly on our whole society.

All these measures are leading to self-destruction and collective suicide based on nothing but a spook.

 

*

Dr Wolfgang Wodarg is a German physician specialising in Pulmonology, politician and former chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. In 2009 he called for an inquiry into alleged conflicts of interest surrounding the EU response to the Swine Flu pandemic.

What he says:

Politicians are being courted by scientists…scientists who want to be important to get money for their institutions. Scientists who just swim along in the mainstream and want their part of it […] And what is missing right now is a rational way of looking at things.

We should be asking questions like “How did you find out this virus was dangerous?”, “How was it before?”, “Didn’t we have the same thing last year?”, “Is it even something new?”

That’s missing.

 

*

Dr Joel Kettner s professor of Community Health Sciences and Surgery at Manitoba University, former Chief Public Health Officer for Manitoba province and Medical Director of the International Centre for Infectious Diseases.

What he says:

I have never seen anything like this, anything anywhere near like this. I’m not talking about the pandemic, because I’ve seen 30 of them, one every year. It is called influenza. And other respiratory illness viruses, we don’t always know what they are. But I’ve never seen this reaction, and I’m trying to understand why.

[…]

I worry about the message to the public, about the fear of coming into contact with people, being in the same space as people, shaking their hands, having meetings with people. I worry about many, many consequences related to that.

[…]

In Hubei, in the province of Hubei, where there has been the most cases and deaths by far, the actual number of cases reported is 1 per 1000 people and the actual rate of deaths reported is 1 per 20,000. So maybe that would help to put things into perspective.

 

Audio Player

Dr John Ioannidis Professor of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy and of Biomedical Data Science, at Stanford University School of Medicine and a Professor of Statistics at Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences. He is director of the Stanford Prevention Research Center, and co-director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS).

He is also the editor-in-chief of the European Journal of Clinical Investigation. He was chairman at the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine as well as adjunct professor at Tufts University School of Medicine.

As a physician, scientist and author he has made contributions to evidence-based medicine, epidemiology, data science and clinical research. In addition, he pioneered the field of meta-research. He has shown that much of the published research does not meet good scientific standards of evidence.

What he says:

Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes. As most health systems have limited testing capacity, selection bias may even worsen in the near future.

The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher.

[…]

Could the Covid-19 case fatality rate be that low? No, some say, pointing to the high rate in elderly people. However, even some so-called mild or common-cold-type coronaviruses that have been known for decades can have case fatality rates as high as 8% when they infect elderly people in nursing homes.

[…]

If we had not known about a new virus out there, and had not checked individuals with PCR tests, the number of total deaths due to “influenza-like illness” would not seem unusual this year. At most, we might have casually noted that flu this season seems to be a bit worse than average.

– “A FIASCO IN THE MAKING? AS THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC TAKES HOLD, WE ARE MAKING DECISIONS WITHOUT RELIABLE DATA”, STAT NEWS, 17TH MARCH 2020

*

Dr Yoram Lass is an Israeli physician, politician and former Director General of the Health Ministry. He also worked as Associate Dean of the Tel Aviv University Medical School and during the 1980s presented the science-based television show Tatzpit.

What he says:

Italy is known for its enormous morbidity in respiratory problems, more than three times any other European country. In the US about 40,000 people die in a regular flu season and so far 40-50 people have died of the coronavirus, most of them in a nursing home in Kirkland, Washington.

[…]

In every country, more people die from regular flu compared with those who die from the coronavirus.

[…]

…there is a very good example that we all forget: the swine flu in 2009. That was a virus that reached the world from Mexico and until today there is no vaccination against it. But what? At that time there was no Facebook or there maybe was but it was still in its infancy. The coronavirus, in contrast, is a virus with public relations.

Whoever thinks that governments end viruses is wrong.

– INTERVIEW IN GLOBES, MARCH 22ND 2020

*

Dr Pietro Vernazza is a Swiss physician specialising Infectious Diseases at the Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen and Professor of Health Policy.

What he says:

We have reliable figures from Italy and a work by epidemiologists, which has been published in the renowned science journal ‹Science›, which examined the spread in China. This makes it clear that around 85 percent of all infections have occurred without anyone noticing the infection. 90 percent of the deceased patients are verifiably over 70 years old, 50 percent over 80 years.

[…]

In Italy, one in ten people diagnosed die, according to the findings of the Science publication, that is statistically one of every 1,000 people infected. Each individual case is tragic, but often – similar to the flu season – it affects people who are at the end of their lives.

[…]

If we close the schools, we will prevent the children from quickly becoming immune.

[…]

We should better integrate the scientific facts into the political decisions.

– INTERVIEW IN ST. GALLER TAGBLATT, 22ND MARCH 2020

*

Frank Ulrich Montgomery is German radiologist, former President of the German Medical Association and Deputy Chairman of the World Medical Association.

What he says:

I’m not a fan of lockdown. Anyone who imposes something like this must also say when and how to pick it up again. Since we have to assume that the virus will be with us for a long time, I wonder when we will return to normal? You can’t keep schools and daycare centers closed until the end of the year. Because it will take at least that long until we have a vaccine. Italy has imposed a lockdown and has the opposite effect. They quickly reached their capacity limits, but did not slow down the virus spread within the lockdown.

– INTERVIEW IN GENERAL ANZEIGER, 18TH MARCH 2020

Source: OffGuardian

*

Prof. Hendrik Streeck is a German HIV researcher, epidemiologist and clinical trialist. He is professor of virology, and the director of the Institute of Virology and HIV Research, at Bonn University.

What he says:

The new pathogen is not that dangerous, it is even less dangerous than Sars-1. The special thing is that Sars-CoV-2 replicates in the upper throat area and is therefore much more infectious because the virus jumps from throat to throat, so to speak. But that is also an advantage: Because Sars-1 replicates in the deep lungs, it is not so infectious, but it definitely gets on the lungs, which makes it more dangerous.

[…]

You also have to take into account that the Sars-CoV-2 deaths in Germany were exclusively old people. In Heinsberg, for example, a 78-year-old man with previous illnesses died of heart failure, and that without Sars-2 lung involvement. Since he was infected, he naturally appears in the Covid 19 statistics. But the question is whether he would not have died anyway, even without Sars-2.

– INTERVIEW IN FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE, 16TH MARCH 2020

*

Dr Yanis Roussel et. al. – A team of researchers from the Institut Hospitalo-universitaire Méditerranée Infection, Marseille and the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, conducting a peer-reviewed study on Coronavirus mortality for the government of France under the ‘Investments for the Future’ programme.

What they say:

The problem of SARS-CoV-2 is probably overestimated, as 2.6 million people die of respiratory infections each year compared with less than 4000 deaths for SARS-CoV-2 at the time of writing.

[…]

This study compared the mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 in OECD countries (1.3%) with the mortality rate of common coronaviruses identified in AP-HM patients (0.8%) from 1 January 2013 to 2 March 2020. Chi-squared test was performed, and the P-value was 0.11 (not significant).

[…]

…it should be noted that systematic studies of other coronaviruses (but not yet for SARS-CoV-2) have found that the percentage of asymptomatic carriers is equal to or even higher than the percentage of symptomatic patients. The same data for SARS-CoV-2 may soon be available, which will further reduce the relative risk associated with this specific pathology.

– “SARS-COV-2: FEAR VERSUS DATA”, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 19TH MARCH 2020

*

Dr. David Katz is an American physician and founding director of the Yale University Prevention Research Center

What he says:

I am deeply concerned that the social, economic and public health consequences of this near-total meltdown of normal life — schools and businesses closed, gatherings banned — will be long-lasting and calamitous, possibly graver than the direct toll of the virus itself. The stock market will bounce back in time, but many businesses never will. The unemployment, impoverishment and despair likely to result will be public health scourges of the first order.

– “IS OUR FIGHT AGAINST CORONAVIRUS WORSE THAN THE DISEASE?”, NEW YORK TIMES 20TH MARCH 2020

*

Michael T. Osterholm is regents professor and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota.

What he says:

Consider the effect of shutting down offices, schools, transportation systems, restaurants, hotels, stores, theaters, concert halls, sporting events and other venues indefinitely and leaving all of their workers unemployed and on the public dole. The likely result would be not just a depression but a complete economic breakdown, with countless permanently lost jobs, long before a vaccine is ready or natural immunity takes hold.

[…]

[T]he best alternative will probably entail letting those at low risk for serious disease continue to work, keep business and manufacturing operating, and “run” society, while at the same time advising higher-risk individuals to protect themselves through physical distancing and ramping up our health-care capacity as aggressively as possible. With this battle plan, we could gradually build up immunity without destroying the financial structure on which our lives are based.

– “FACING COVID-19 REALITY: A NATIONAL LOCKDOWN IS NO CURE”, WASHINGTON POST 21ST MARCH 2020

*

Dr Peter Goetzsche is Professor of Clinical Research Design and Analysis at the University of Copenhagen and founder of the Cochrane Medical Collaboration. He has written several books on corruption in the field of medicine and the power of big pharmaceutical companies.

What he says:

Our main problem is that no one will ever get in trouble for measures that are too draconian. They will only get in trouble if they do too little. So, our politicians and those working with public health do much more than they should do.

No such draconian measures were applied during the 2009 influenza pandemic, and they obviously cannot be applied every winter, which is all year round, as it is always winter somewhere. We cannot close down the whole world permanently.

Should it turn out that the epidemic wanes before long, there will be a queue of people wanting to take credit for this. And we can be damned sure draconian measures will be applied again next time. But remember the joke about tigers. “Why do you blow the horn?” “To keep the tigers away.” “But there are no tigers here.” “There you see!”

– “CORONA: AN EPIDEMIC OF MASS PANIC”, BLOG POST ON DEADLY MEDICINES 21ST MARCH 2020

*

Our thanks to OffGuardian for bringing this article to our attention

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

 

The original source of this article is OffGuardian

Copyright © OffGuardian, OffGuardian, 2020

 

 

Source:

https://www.globalresearch.ca/12-experts-questioning-coronavirus-panic/5707532

 

Source:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=p_AyuhbnPOI&feature=emb_logo

 

A Fiasco in the Making? As the Coronavirus Pandemic Takes Hold, We Are Making Decisions Without Reliable Data

 

Source: 

https://www.globalresearch.ca/coronavirus-pandemic-takes-hold-we-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/5707168?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles

 

 

Status of COVID-19

As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious diseases (HCID) in the UK.

The 4 nations public health HCID group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID. This was based on consideration of the UK HCID criteria about the virus and the disease with information available during the early stages of the outbreak. Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall), and there is now greater clinical awareness and a specific and sensitive laboratory test, the availability of which continues to increase.

The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID.

The need to have a national, coordinated response remains, but this is being met by the government’s COVID-19 response.

Cases of COVID-19 are no longer managed by HCID treatment centres only. All healthcare workers managing possible and confirmed cases should follow the updated national infection and prevention (IPC) guidance for COVID-19, which supersedes all previous IPC guidance for COVID-19. This guidance includes instructions about different personal protective equipment (PPE) ensembles that are appropriate for different clinical scenarios.

 

Source:

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid#status-of-covid-19

Source: 

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid

 

Red and Blue America Agree That Now Is the Time to Violate the Constitution

 

People of both parties seem rather okay with undermining core civil liberties in order to fight the pandemic.

MARCH 25, 2020

 

Countries are taking extraordinary measures to slow the COVID-19 pandemic. Many of these measures limit individual freedom and may also violate rights guaranteed by national constitutions. Italy’s complete lockdown, enforced by criminal penalties, probably violates its constitution. Norwegian lawmakers have proposed an emergency law that temporarily gives the government unprecedented power to override the constitution and national laws to thwart the virus. Meanwhile, without consulting the Israeli Parliament, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu enacted emergency regulations allowing for stunning surveillance power to combat the virus. Never one to waste a good crisis, Hungary’s Viktor Orbán will likely be able to rule by decree for the foreseeable future.

 

The United States now faces this same dilemma: To what extent should the Constitution be violated to fight the coronavirus? Lockdowns, especially ones that apply to people who haven’t tested positive for the virus, are constitutionally questionable. The threat by the leaders of Newark, New Jersey, to prosecute residents who spread false information about the virus—if carried out—could violate the First Amendment. Some people in California have challenged the city of San Jose’s authority to force a gun shop to close, citing their right to arm themselves. Perhaps most alarming, the U.S. Department of Justice “has quietly asked Congress for the ability to ask chief judges to detain people indefinitely without trial during emergencies.”

 

To assess how Americans weigh the trade-off between preserving civil liberties and halting the spread of the coronavirus, we conducted a survey last week, just as state and local governments were beginning to implement their most restrictive policies yet. The survey reveals a remarkable willingness to tolerate civil-rights violations in order to confront the pandemic, regardless of party affiliation.

We presented a nationally representative sample of 3,000 U.S. residents with eight possible policy responses to the outbreak, all of which may be unconstitutional, including forced quarantine in a government facility, criminal penalties for spreading misinformation, bans against certain people entering the country, and conscription of health-care workers. We also asked our sample to imagine that public-health officials had reviewed the policies and estimated that each would likely save some number of lives, hypothetical figures that we provided.

A majority of respondents supported all eight of these policies, most by considerable margins. The proposals with the lowest support were seizing businesses and banning all citizens and noncitizens outside the country from entering, but these policies still had 58 and 63 percent support, respectively. The proposals with the highest levels of support were banning noncitizens from entering the country (85 percent) and conscripting health-care professionals to work despite risks to their own health (78 percent). Both policies burden a defined minority of the population, so it’s not surprising that large majorities support them. But criminalizing speech based on its content, an idea antithetical to modern American constitutionalism, was also very popular: About 70 percent of respondents supported restricting people’s ability to say things that may qualify as misinformation. Likewise, 77 percent of respondents support suspending all religious services and gatherings, thereby restricting religious freedom. And even when we explicitly told half of our sample that the policies may violate the Constitution, the majority supported all eight of them—even the speech restrictions.

 

Perhaps the most striking feature of our results is the broad bipartisan endorsement of these liberty-restricting policies. Like other surveys, ours reflected a huge gap between Democrats and Republicans in approval of President Donald Trump’s handling of the pandemic: 34 percent of Democrats expressed approval, while 88 percent of Republicans did. One might have reasonably concluded that different policy preferences were driving these responses: that Democrats want aggressive government intervention, which they feel the president has failed to deliver, while Republicans—encouraged by Trump’s early dismissal of the outbreak—prefer a wait-and-see or laissez-faire approach.

 

But our findings suggest that’s not the case. Democrats and Republicans alike are willing to sacrifice civil liberties to fight the virus. The two groups show almost identical levels of support for detaining sick people in government facilities, conscripting people to work, prohibiting the spreading of misinformation, and banning all people (citizens and noncitizens alike) from entering the country. Seventy-four percent of Democrats supported each of the eight proposed policies, while 71 percent of Republicans did. This small disparity contrasts with several recent survey findings showing that Americans with different political affiliations are responding to the crisis very differently. For example, The Atlantic reported on Friday that blue states are responding more aggressively to the outbreak than red states are, and an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll conducted last week found that Democrats were 28 percentage points more likely to be concerned about someone in their family getting the COVID-19 than Republicans. Even so, both sides are convinced that aggressive measures are needed to save lives.

 

Often, efforts to roll back civil liberties face political opposition, but now bipartisan support for rights-restricting COVID-19 responses could smooth the path for constitutional erosion. James Madison predicted as much when he described constitutional rights as “parchment barriers,” easily transgressed when the majority is so inclined. And indeed, history presents numerous examples of liberty violations made in the face of security threats: the Alien and Sedition Acts signed into law by President John Adams, Japanese American internment camps during WWII, and the use of torture after 9/11. After the threat has subsided, Americans must recognize any constitutional violations for what they were, lest they become the new normal.

 

Source: 

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/coronavirus-america-constitution/608665/

 

Capelle sluit 14 speelplekken en voetbalkooien

 

De gemeente Capelle aan den IJssel sluit per direct 14 speelplekken in de stad waar veel jongeren bij elkaar komen. Burgemeester Oskam gebruikt hiervoor de regionale noodverordening.

 

Onder de gesloten speelplekken bevinden zich de voetbalkooien in Fascinatio, verschillende Johan Cruijff voetbalveldjes en de JOP’s (Jongeren Ontmoetings Plekken) in Capelle.

Burgemeester Oskam neemt dit besluit omdat hij constateert dat er in zijn gemeente te veel jongeren zich niet aan de regels houden: "De gezondheid van bezoekers van deze plekken staat voorop. Op de speelplekken, voetbalkooien en Cruijffveldjes komen nu te veel jongeren samen die te dicht op elkaar staan, spelen of sporten. Het handhaven van de regel om 1,5 meter afstand tot elkaar te houden en te voorkomen dat er groepjes mensen van drie of meer personen ontstaan is op deze plekken in Capelle onmogelijk. Daarom sluit ik ze per direct."

De burgemeester roept daarnaast jong en oud op om dit weekend zoveel mogelijk thuis te blijven. "Samen kunnen we de verdere verspreiding van het virus tegenhouden. Blijf daarom thuis. De situatie vraagt om een opoffering van iedereen. Het sluiten van de speelplekken, Johan Cruijff voetbalveldjes en voetbalkooien gaat me echt aan het hart. Zodra het maar enigszins mogelijk is gaan de speelplekken weer open."

De Capelse handhavers en de politie waarschuwen overtreders en delen indien nodig ook boetes uit. Deze kunnen oplopen tot maximaal 400 euro. Bij de 14 locaties in Capelle worden waarschuwingsborden geplaatst. Handhavers letten ook op andere plekken in Capelle op samenscholingen van groepen van meer dan drie personen. 

 

Source: 

https://www.rijnmond.nl/nieuws/193723/Capelle-sluit-14-speelplekken-en-voetbalkooien

What You Need to Know about the Global Coronavirus Plan in America

by Celeste Solum January 24, 2020

I thought you need to know this:

APPREHENSION

  • Ask if you are free to leave.
  • Ask if you are being arrested.
  • Always deal with a supervisor. 
  • Do not run from this situation it gives the appearance that you are guilty.
  • Always carry with you the Public Servant Questionnaire and ask every single person apprehending you to fill it out. Email me for the Public Servant Questionnaire. 
  • Ask for detailed clarity on why you are being apprehended.  The 5 w’s come to mind.  Who, what, where, why, when.
  • From the moment you are detained trying to record all interactions with your phone or other recording device. 
  • Always get the name of all individuals involved in your detainment.
  • Make mental notes of attitude, surroundings, engagements, or anything that you feel is important.  This is the time to use your situational awareness or mindful living skills.
  • Be aware that legal orders, motions, and templates authorizing medical evaluation of non-compliant persons who may be ill may have been initiated. 

FORCED EXAMINATIONS

  • Become familiar with what this regulation permits and does not permit.  The regulation itself is a bit ambiguous saying a qualified medical person may take biological samples and yet it says that they may not do anything invasive like a blood draw.
  • Get the name and medical qualifications of each individual involved in your forced medical exam.  Have them fill out the Public Servant Questionnaire. 
  • Ask for clarity on why you are being forcefully examined.
  • Request a medical doctor, although you probably will not get one.
  • Do not allow them to take DNA. 
  • Be aware that under this regulation, although not specifically addressed it leaves it open for cavity searches.  Decide now how you want to handle that situation.  Do you want it recorded?
  • Have a pre-written letter requesting copies of all medical records and hand it to the supervisor. 
  • Unless immediately quarantined, and every time you are forcefully examined, go to your family doctor (preferably) or nearest clinic for a Third Party examination. 
  • Immediately after a forced examination, file an FOIA request, for all records relating to the day in question including outbreak, your detention, and your forced medical exam. 
  • During WWII people were not given a choice on if they consented for a forced examination. 
  • Prayer is helpful to keep you calm and detached from this intrusion into your body and privacy.
  • After a forced examination you may want to talk with a spiritual mentor, friend, spouse or a compassionate person that you know as you process the feelings of violation and abuse.
  • PUBLIC SCREENING

    • According to this regulation any time you are in public or anywhere you can be forcibly screened for public health safety measures. 
    • This screening may not include invasive procedures but your definition of invasive will be different than a public health safety officer. 
    • For your safety and security I would request that any Public Health officer screening you fill out the Public Servant Questionnaire.  That way you know who is involved, where the data on your screening goes and why it is being conducted.  It will save time later if there is a problem such as quarantine. 

    ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE

    This regulation allows the federal government to use and all technology, including future technologies, to surveillance for public health threats.  You have zero privacy if you are using anything technological. 

    You may be forced to engage in technological surveillance such as wearable technology for a Conditional Release.  Think of it as a get out of jail card, but it isn’t free.

    TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS, QUARANTINE, ISOLATION, CONDITIONAL RELEASE

    • If in the government’s eyes there is a reasonable suspicion that you are ill travel restrictions can be implemented and issuance of travel permits can be issued.
    • Travel restrictions and travel permits are only for people who are designated as quarantined, isolated, or conditional release orders so let’s say you can go to work. 
    • The CDC or HHS must issue you a written order for quarantine, isolation or conditional release.
    • Quarantine, isolation or conditional release is only for particular infections but those can change any minute by various entities.  For our purposes unless you are traveling abroad the ones that will impact you are respiratory infections and influenza. 
    • Ensure the existence of a statute, regulation, or another administrative mechanism that authorized isolation/quarantine.  Have them present that to you. 
    • States are responsible for the health of people in their state so if you have been served a Quarantine, isolation or conditional release appeal to the state department of health. 
    • Request a state DOH Administrative Hearing.  Each state will have its own rules for this so you will have to look up the agency, then Administrative Hearing.  There is a timeline to follow.
    • Request a federal medical review.
    • Request a mandatory reassessment of the order. 
    • Request availability of workers’ compensation and/or other forms of financial support for persons unable to return to work because of an isolation/quarantine order.
    • Request a reintegration to persons under a isolation/Quarantine order such as letter to employer or school giving a reason for your absence and that you are no longer contagious.  
    • Request the procedure for enforcement of isolation/quarantine orders.
    • Ask what type of memoranda of agreement (MOA) or understanding (MOU) allow for the loaning of facilities or other services necessary to implement a quarantine and/or isolation order for a person who cannot be isolated at home (e.g., travelers, homeless populations).
    • Ask for written data sharing/data use/confidentiality agreements related to sharing of confidential patient medical information between public health and other partners.

    DUE PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS

    • Ensure there is a definition for all words that you are concerned about during your experience for instance terms such as “quarantine,” “isolation,” and “detention”.
    • Did you receive adequate notice, opportunity to contest, administrative determination?
    • Did you have access to legal counsel, if desired
    • Request the policies to satisfy due process in different isolation/quarantine scenarios (e.g., “voluntary” home isolation, isolation in a guarded facility, exclusion from certain public activities).
    • Request the written plan for hearing cases and/or appeals for persons subject to isolation/quarantine orders (e.g., participation via telephone, video conference).

    UNDERSTAND …

    You may be required to self-monitor for medical conditions (e.g., temperature checks) and (where applicable) via draft legal orders or contractual agreements.

    Be aware that legal counsel has reviewed the feasibility of issuing “exclusion” orders (i.e., excluding contacts from using public transportation, attending public meetings) and, where applicable, drafted templates and legal orders.

    Isolation/quarantine may be in a home, hospital, or other designated facility.

    Vetted faith-based organizations to assist or provide services to persons in isolation and quarantine.

    Early in an outbreak or operation you can expect allot of mis-information and dis-information, especially with DeepFakes from artificial intelligence. 

    Get ready my friends, this localized incident will expand to the global beast that it is.  

    ___________________________________________________________

    Celeste has worked as a contractor for Homeland Security and FEMA. Her training and activations include the infamous day of 911, flood and earthquake operations, mass casualty exercises, and numerous other operations. Celeste is FEMA certified and has completed the Professional Development Emergency Management Series.

    • Train-the-Trainer
    • Incident Command
    • Integrated EM: Preparedness, Response, Recovery, Mitigation
    • Emergency Plan Design including all Emergency Support Functions
    • Principles of Emergency Management
    • Developing Volunteer Resources
    • Emergency Planning and Development
    • Leadership and Influence, Decision Making in Crisis
    • Exercise Design and Evaluation
    • Public Assistance Applications
    • Emergency Operations Interface
    • Public Information Officer
    • Flood Fight Operations
    • Domestic Preparedness for Weapons of Mass Destruction
    • Incident Command (ICS-NIMS)
    • Multi-Hazards for Schools
    • Rapid Evaluation of Structures-Earthquakes
    • Weather Spotter for National Weather Service
    • Logistics, Operations, Communications
    • Community Emergency Response Team Leader
    • Behavior Recognition

    Celeste grew up in military & governmental home with her father working for the Naval Warfare Center, and later as Assistant Director for Public Lands and Natural Resources, in both Washington State and California.

    Celeste also has training and expertise in small agricultural lobbying, Integrative/Functional Medicine, asymmetrical and symmetrical warfare, and Organic Farming..

    EMF Protection

    My educational eBooks

    Prep Resources for the Climate Chaos

 

Source:

https://watb.tv/cs-prep/

Source:

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/experts3.jpg?x32635

 

 

Apr 17, 2020 

8 MORE Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic

 

 

Our third batch of Medical experts dissenting from the media/political “consensus”.

* * *

Dr John Lee is an English consultant histopathologist at Rotherham General Hospital and formerly clinical professor of pathology at Hull York Medical School. He is most notable to the wider public as co-presenter (with Gunther von Hagens) of Anatomy for Beginners (screened in the UK on Channel 4 in 2005), Autopsy: Life and Death (Channel 4, 2006) and Autopsy: Emergency Room (Channel 4, 2007).

What he says:

But there’s another, potentially even more serious problem: the way that deaths are recorded. If someone dies of a respiratory infection in the UK, the specific cause of the infection is not usually recorded, unless the illness is a rare ‘notifiable disease’.

So the vast majority of respiratory deaths in the UK are recorded as bronchopneumonia, pneumonia, old age or a similar designation. We don’t really test for flu, or other seasonal infections. If the patient has, say, cancer, motor neurone disease or another serious disease, this will be recorded as the cause of death, even if the final illness was a respiratory infection. This means UK certifications normally under-record deaths due to respiratory infections.

Now look at what has happened since the emergence of Covid-19. The list of notifiable diseases has been updated. This list — as well as containing smallpox (which has been extinct for many years) and conditions such as anthrax, brucellosis, plague and rabies (which most UK doctors will never see in their entire careers) — has now been amended to include Covid-19. But not flu. That means every positive test for Covid-19 must be notified, in a way that it just would not be for flu or most other infections.

 How deadly is the coronavirus? It’s still far from clear, The Specator, 28th March 2020<

*

Few tests have been carried out in patients with mild symptoms. This means that the number of positive tests will be far lower than the number of people who have had the disease. Sir Patrick Vallance, the government’s chief scientific adviser, has been trying to stress this.

He suggested that the real figure for the number of cases could be 10 to 20 times higher than the official figure. If he’s right, the headline death rate due to this virus will be 10 to 20 times lower than it appears to be from the published figures.

[…]

The distinction between dying ‘with’ Covid-19 and dying ‘due to’ Covid-19 is not just splitting hairs. Consider some examples: an 87-year-old woman with dementia in a nursing home; a 79-year-old man with metastatic bladder cancer; a 29-year-old man with leukaemia treated with chemotherapy; a 46-year-old woman with motor neurone disease for 2 years.

All develop chest infections and die. All test positive for Covid-19. Yet all were vulnerable to death by chest infection from any infective cause (including the flu).

 How to understand & report figures for ‘Covid deaths’, The Spectator, 29th March 2020

*

Dr. John Oxford is an English virologist and Professor at Queen Mary, University of London. He is a leading expert on influenza, including bird flu and the 1918 Spanish Influenza, and HIV/AIDS.

What he says:

Personally, I would say the best advice is to spend less time watching TV news which is sensational and not very good. Personally, I view this Covid outbreak as akin to a bad winter influenza epidemic. In this case we have had 8000 deaths this last year in the ‘at risk’ groups viz over 65% people with heart disease etc. I do not feel this current Covid will exceed this number. We are suffering from a media epidemic!

– “A VIEW FROM THE HVIVO / OPEN ORPHAN #ORPH LABORATORY”, blog post on Novus Communications website, March 31st 2020

*

Prof Knut Wittkowski is German-American researcher and professor of epidemiology. He worked for 15 on the Epidemiology of HIV before heading for 20 years the Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design at The Rockefeller University, New York.
What he says:

With all respiratory diseases, the only thing that stops the disease is herd immunity. About 80% of the people need to have had contact with the virus, and the majority of them won’t even have recognized that they were infected, or they had very, very mild symptoms, especially if they are children. So, it’s very important to keep the schools open and kids mingling to spread the virus to get herd immunity as fast as possible.
[…]
We are experiencing all sorts of counterproductive consequences of not well-thought-through policy
[…]
I have been an epidemiologist for 35 years, and I have been modeling epidemics for 35 years. It’s a pleasure to have the ability to help people to understand, but it’s a struggle to get heard.

 

Dr Klaus Püschel is German forensic pathologist and former professor of forensics at Essen University and current director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. He has worked on many noteworthy autopsies, as well high-profile forensic archaeological studies.

Contrary to the guidelines of the Robert Koch Institute, his office in Hamburg has started to differentiate between deaths with and from coronavirus, which led to a decrease in Covid19 deaths.

What he says:

This virus influences our lives in a completely excessive way. This is disproportionate to the danger posed by the virus. And the astronomical economic damage now being caused is not commensurate with the danger posed by the virus. I am convinced that the Corona mortality rate will not even show up as a peak in annual mortality.

All those we have examined so far had cancer, a chronic lung disease, were heavy smokers or severely obese, suffered from diabetes or had a cardiovascular disease. The virus was the last straw that broke the camel’s back, so to speak […] Covid-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection.

– “Der streit ums richtige Mas”, Hamburger Morgenpost, 3rd April 2020

*

In quite a few cases, we have also found that the current corona infection has nothing whatsoever to do with the fatal outcome because other causes of death are present, for example, a brain haemorrhage or a heart attack. [Covid19 is] not particularly dangerous viral disease […] All speculations about individual deaths that have not been expertly examined only fuel anxiety.

– “Von den Toten lernen für die Lebenden”, Hamburger AbendBlatt, 2nd April 2020

*

Dr Alexander Kekulé is a German doctor and biochemist. He has held the Chair for Medical Microbiology and Virology at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg since 1999 and is the current Director of the Institute for Medical Microbiology at the University Hospital Halle.

What he says:

It’s impossible to wait for a vaccine […] The quickest we could have a vaccine ready is in six months. Based on experience, I’d say the reality is closer to a year. We can’t stay under lockdown for six months to a year. If we did that our society and our culture would be ruined.
[…]
People under 50 are very, very unlikely to die or get seriously ill from the coronavirus. We have to let them get infected so they can develop immunity.

– “‘Infect the young and isolate those at risk’ – One German scientist’s plan to end the lockdown”, The Telegraph, 11th April 2020

*

Dr Claus Köhnlein is a German Internist based in Kiel and co-author of the book Virus Mania

What he says:

[The coronavirus test] is a PCA-based test, where false positives are programmed in.

Half of [the positive tests] could be wrong. PCA tests often show false positives. You can ask professor Gigerenzer in Berlin about this problem area. The tests are very sensitive. If you have only one molecule of something, the test can show positive. That doesn’t mean the patient is sick, or that he has the coronavirus; it doesn’t get isolated, but one relies wholly on these tests.

At the moment one can’t say how high the mortality rate really is, we need significantly more testing and significantly more sick or deceased people. It is too soon.

But the spreading panic is in large parts founded on news from Italy. And nowadays one doesn’t know how much of it is fake news. I have seen Italian doctors online, where I have compelling suspicions something isn’t right with what they say.

I am a clinician and I don’t see a new disease on the horizon. If you took away the test, life would go on as before, there wouldn’t be anything to see.

 

*

Dr Gérard Krause is head the Department for Epidemiology at the Helmholtz Centre for Infection in Braunschweig, director of the Institute for Infectious Disease Epidemiology at TWINCORE in Hannover and Chair of the PhD Program Epidemiology at the Hannover Medical School. He also coordinates the Translational Infrastructure Epidemiology at the German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF).

What he says:

We have to keep these serious social measures as short and as low as possible, because they could potentially cause more illnesses and deaths than the coronavirus itself.

Although my focus is on infectious diseases, I believe that it is imperative that we consider the impact on other areas of health and society. We as a society must not focus solely on the victims of the corona virus.

We know that unemployment, for example, causes illness and even increased mortality. It can also drive people into suicide. Restricting freedom of movement is likely to have a further negative impact on public health.

It is not so easy to calculate such consequences directly, but they still happen and they can possibly be more serious than the consequences of the infections themselves.

– Interview for zdf.de, 29th March 2020

*

Dr Gerd Gigerenzer is a German psychologist, professor of psychology and Director of the Harding Center for Risk Literacy at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin.
What he says:

The 2009 swine flu epidemic killed hundreds of thousands, mostly in Africa and Southeast Asia. But in Europe, where the threat was comparatively small, the media updated the death toll and the number of suspected cases on a daily basis. In the United Kingdom, the government predicted that as many as 65,000 citizens might die from the disease. In the end, fewer than 500 died.

Predictably, such daily accounting triggered fear and led politicians to make hasty, ill-advised decisions – such as stockpiling medication – without examining the evidence. All eyes were focused on the new, unknown virus, and not on protecting people from more lethal threats, such as seasonal influenza, which in 2009 killed orders of magnitude more people than swine flu. It still does – as would be clear if the media bombarded us with hourly updates of the flu-related death toll.

Similarly, millions of people, particularly in developing countries, die from malaria and tuberculosis each year. And in the United States alone, hospital-acquired infections kill some 99,000 patients annually. Yet, these unlucky people get next to no attention.

Why are we more scared of what is less likely to kill us?

[…]

[W]hen swine flu spread, many governments followed the World Health Organization’s advice and stockpiled Tamiflu, a medication that was marketed to protect against the severe consequences of flu. Yet, many expert advisers to the WHO had financial ties to drug manufacturers, and there is still no evidence that Tamiflu is effective. The US wasted over $1 billion, and the UK over £400,000 ($522,000), on this medication – money that instead could have been invested in improving health care.

 Why What Does Not Kill Us Makes Us Panic, Project Syndicate, 12th March 2020

*

BONUS: Dr Pietro Vernazza of Switzerland was featured in our first “experts list”, but he has since written four more articles on various aspects of the coronavirus, including testing programs, medical masks and if closing schools may be counter-productive.

*

If you can find any other examples of noteworthy experts deviating from the mainstream narrative, please post them below. As always, this list would have been impossible to build without Swiss Propaganda Research. Follow their work and share widely. An indispensable resource.

 

Source:

https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/17/8-more-experts-questioning-the-coronavirus-panic/

 Source: 

https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/medical-experts.jpg?x32635

 

Mar 24, 2020 

12 Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic

 

 

Below is our list of twelve medical experts whose opinions on the Coronavirus outbreak contradict the official narratives of the MSM, and the memes so prevalent on social media.

* * *

Dr Sucharit Bhakdi is a specialist in microbiology. He was a professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz and head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene and one of the most cited research scientists in German history.

What he says:

We are afraid that 1 million infections with the new virus will lead to 30 deaths per day over the next 100 days. But we do not realise that 20, 30, 40 or 100 patients positive for normal coronaviruses are already dying every day.

[The government’s anti-COVID19 measures] are grotesque, absurd and very dangerous […] The life expectancy of millions is being shortened. The horrifying impact on the world economy threatens the existence of countless people. The consequences on medical care are profound. Already services to patients in need are reduced, operations cancelled, practices empty, hospital personnel dwindling. All this will impact profoundly on our whole society.

All these measures are leading to self-destruction and collective suicide based on nothing but a spook.

 

*

Dr Wolfgang Wodarg is a German physician specialising in Pulmonology, politician and former chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. In 2009 he called for an inquiry into alleged conflicts of interest surrounding the EU response to the Swine Flu pandemic.

What he says:

Politicians are being courted by scientists…scientists who want to be important to get money for their institutions. Scientists who just swim along in the mainstream and want their part of it […] And what is missing right now is a rational way of looking at things.

We should be asking questions like “How did you find out this virus was dangerous?”, “How was it before?”, “Didn’t we have the same thing last year?”, “Is it even something new?”

That’s missing.

 

*

Dr Joel Kettner s professor of Community Health Sciences and Surgery at Manitoba University, former Chief Public Health Officer for Manitoba province and Medical Director of the International Centre for Infectious Diseases.

What he says:

I have never seen anything like this, anything anywhere near like this. I’m not talking about the pandemic, because I’ve seen 30 of them, one every year. It is called influenza. And other respiratory illness viruses, we don’t always know what they are. But I’ve never seen this reaction, and I’m trying to understand why.

[…]

I worry about the message to the public, about the fear of coming into contact with people, being in the same space as people, shaking their hands, having meetings with people. I worry about many, many consequences related to that.

[…]

In Hubei, in the province of Hubei, where there has been the most cases and deaths by far, the actual number of cases reported is 1 per 1000 people and the actual rate of deaths reported is 1 per 20,000. So maybe that would help to put things into perspective.

Audio Player

*

Dr John Ioannidis Professor of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy and of Biomedical Data Science, at Stanford University School of Medicine and a Professor of Statistics at Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences. He is director of the Stanford Prevention Research Center, and co-director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS).

He is also the editor-in-chief of the European Journal of Clinical Investigation. He was chairman at the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine as well as adjunct professor at Tufts University School of Medicine.

As a physician, scientist and author he has made contributions to evidence-based medicine, epidemiology, data science and clinical research. In addition, he pioneered the field of meta-research. He has shown that much of the published research does not meet good scientific standards of evidence.

What he says:

Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes. As most health systems have limited testing capacity, selection bias may even worsen in the near future.

The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher.

[…]

Could the Covid-19 case fatality rate be that low? No, some say, pointing to the high rate in elderly people. However, even some so-called mild or common-cold-type coronaviruses that have been known for decades can have case fatality rates as high as 8% when they infect elderly people in nursing homes.

[…]

If we had not known about a new virus out there, and had not checked individuals with PCR tests, the number of total deaths due to “influenza-like illness” would not seem unusual this year. At most, we might have casually noted that flu this season seems to be a bit worse than average.

– “A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data”, Stat News, 17th March 2020

*

Dr Yoram Lass is an Israeli physician, politician and former Director General of the Health Ministry. He also worked as Associate Dean of the Tel Aviv University Medical School and during the 1980s presented the science-based television show Tatzpit.

What he says:

Italy is known for its enormous morbidity in respiratory problems, more than three times any other European country. In the US about 40,000 people die in a regular flu season and so far 40-50 people have died of the coronavirus, most of them in a nursing home in Kirkland, Washington.

[…]

In every country, more people die from regular flu compared with those who die from the coronavirus.

[…]

…there is a very good example that we all forget: the swine flu in 2009. That was a virus that reached the world from Mexico and until today there is no vaccination against it. But what? At that time there was no Facebook or there maybe was but it was still in its infancy. The coronavirus, in contrast, is a virus with public relations.

Whoever thinks that governments end viruses is wrong.

– Interview in Globes, March 22nd 2020

*

Dr Pietro Vernazza is a Swiss physician specialising Infectious Diseases at the Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen and Professor of Health Policy.

What he says:

We have reliable figures from Italy and a work by epidemiologists, which has been published in the renowned science journal ‹Science›, which examined the spread in China. This makes it clear that around 85 percent of all infections have occurred without anyone noticing the infection. 90 percent of the deceased patients are verifiably over 70 years old, 50 percent over 80 years.

[…]

In Italy, one in ten people diagnosed die, according to the findings of the Science publication, that is statistically one of every 1,000 people infected. Each individual case is tragic, but often – similar to the flu season – it affects people who are at the end of their lives.

[…]

If we close the schools, we will prevent the children from quickly becoming immune.

[…]

We should better integrate the scientific facts into the political decisions.

– Interview in St. Galler Tagblatt, 22nd March 2020

*

Frank Ulrich Montgomery is German radiologist, former President of the German Medical Association and Deputy Chairman of the World Medical Association.

What he says:

I’m not a fan of lockdown. Anyone who imposes something like this must also say when and how to pick it up again. Since we have to assume that the virus will be with us for a long time, I wonder when we will return to normal? You can’t keep schools and daycare centers closed until the end of the year. Because it will take at least that long until we have a vaccine. Italy has imposed a lockdown and has the opposite effect. They quickly reached their capacity limits, but did not slow down the virus spread within the lockdown.

– Interview in General Anzeiger, 18th March 2020

*

Prof. Hendrik Streeck is a German HIV researcher, epidemiologist and clinical trialist. He is professor of virology, and the director of the Institute of Virology and HIV Research, at Bonn University.

What he says:

The new pathogen is not that dangerous, it is even less dangerous than Sars-1. The special thing is that Sars-CoV-2 replicates in the upper throat area and is therefore much more infectious because the virus jumps from throat to throat, so to speak. But that is also an advantage: Because Sars-1 replicates in the deep lungs, it is not so infectious, but it definitely gets on the lungs, which makes it more dangerous.

[…]

You also have to take into account that the Sars-CoV-2 deaths in Germany were exclusively old people. In Heinsberg, for example, a 78-year-old man with previous illnesses died of heart failure, and that without Sars-2 lung involvement. Since he was infected, he naturally appears in the Covid 19 statistics. But the question is whether he would not have died anyway, even without Sars-2.

– Interview in Frankfurter Allgemeine, 16th March 2020

*

Dr Yanis Roussel et. al. – A team of researchers from the Institut Hospitalo-universitaire Méditerranée Infection, Marseille and the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, conducting a peer-reviewed study on Coronavirus mortality for the government of France under the ‘Investments for the Future’ programme.

What they say:

The problem of SARS-CoV-2 is probably overestimated, as 2.6 million people die of respiratory infections each year compared with less than 4000 deaths for SARS-CoV-2 at the time of writing.

[…]

This study compared the mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 in OECD countries (1.3%) with the mortality rate of common coronaviruses identified in AP-HM patients (0.8%) from 1 January 2013 to 2 March 2020. Chi-squared test was performed, and the P-value was 0.11 (not significant).

[…]

…it should be noted that systematic studies of other coronaviruses (but not yet for SARS-CoV-2) have found that the percentage of asymptomatic carriers is equal to or even higher than the percentage of symptomatic patients. The same data for SARS-CoV-2 may soon be available, which will further reduce the relative risk associated with this specific pathology.

– “SARS-CoV-2: fear versus data”, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 19th March 2020

*

Dr. David Katz is an American physician and founding director of the Yale University Prevention Research Center

What he says:

I am deeply concerned that the social, economic and public health consequences of this near-total meltdown of normal life — schools and businesses closed, gatherings banned — will be long-lasting and calamitous, possibly graver than the direct toll of the virus itself. The stock market will bounce back in time, but many businesses never will. The unemployment, impoverishment and despair likely to result will be public health scourges of the first order.

– “Is Our Fight Against Coronavirus Worse Than the Disease?”, New York Times 20th March 2020

*

Michael T. Osterholm is regents professor and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota.

What he says:

Consider the effect of shutting down offices, schools, transportation systems, restaurants, hotels, stores, theaters, concert halls, sporting events and other venues indefinitely and leaving all of their workers unemployed and on the public dole. The likely result would be not just a depression but a complete economic breakdown, with countless permanently lost jobs, long before a vaccine is ready or natural immunity takes hold.

[…]

[T]he best alternative will probably entail letting those at low risk for serious disease continue to work, keep business and manufacturing operating, and “run” society, while at the same time advising higher-risk individuals to protect themselves through physical distancing and ramping up our health-care capacity as aggressively as possible. With this battle plan, we could gradually build up immunity without destroying the financial structure on which our lives are based.

– “Facing covid-19 reality: A national lockdown is no cure”, Washington Post 21st March 2020

*

Dr Peter Goetzsche is Professor of Clinical Research Design and Analysis at the University of Copenhagen and founder of the Cochrane Medical Collaboration. He has written several books on corruption in the field of medicine and the power of big pharmaceutical companies.

What he says:

Our main problem is that no one will ever get in trouble for measures that are too draconian. They will only get in trouble if they do too little. So, our politicians and those working with public health do much more than they should do.

No such draconian measures were applied during the 2009 influenza pandemic, and they obviously cannot be applied every winter, which is all year round, as it is always winter somewhere. We cannot close down the whole world permanently.

Should it turn out that the epidemic wanes before long, there will be a queue of people wanting to take credit for this. And we can be damned sure draconian measures will be applied again next time. But remember the joke about tigers. “Why do you blow the horn?” “To keep the tigers away.” “But there are no tigers here.” “There you see!”

– “Corona: an epidemic of mass panic”, blog post on Deadly Medicines 21st March 2020

 

Source:

https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/24/12-experts-questioning-the-coronavirus-panic/

Klik hier om een tekst te typen.

Create a Free Website With JouwWeb